Rewriting the Treatment Paradigm: Ilizarov Method Achieves High Success in Septic Non-Unions Without Local...

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics of a cohort of patients who underwent surgery for septic non-union of the lower extremities. Methods: We analyzed clinical data from 74 patients affected by septic non-union of long bones in the lower extremities, treated with the Ilizarov method between January 2006 and December 2021. The primary objective of our study was to describe the time from surgery to bone union. Results: Patients had undergone a median of three previous surgical interventions, had an average bone defect of 5.4 cm, with 43.4% of patients having a Non-Union Scoring System (NUSS) > 75 points, and 46.5% of patients having been considered candidates for limb amputation in other centers. Bone union was achieved in 73 patients (98.65%), while infection resolution was achieved in 68 patients (91.89%). In 63 patients (85.13%), healing was obtained with one surgical procedure only. Only 11 re-interventions were necessary after frame removal (14.86%): 10 were due to re-fractures (13.51%) and 1 to an infection recurrence, which resulted in an amputation (1.35%). At a time of 6.01 ± 3.9 years follow-up, the Association for the Study and Application of the Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system indicated excellent or good outcomes in 97.3% for the bone subscale and in 89.2% for the functional subscale. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) showed that 96.8% of patients were "very much improved" or "much improved". Patients who have suffered a more recent trauma or fewer previous surgeries achieved a better outcome. Conclusions: Despite some limitations, this study shows that treatment of septic non-unions using the Ilizarov method is both highly effective in bone and infection healing and results in a satisfactory functional outcome. The results observed in our cohort suggest that the Ilizarov method could be critically re-evaluated as a primary treatment option for these challenging cases. The clinical relevance of these findings lies in their potential to significantly alter the current treatment paradigm, by questioning the need for biologic adjuncts and local antibiotics, thereby reducing healthcare costs.