Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Breathing Techniques and Digital Solutions for Enhancing Running Performance
Published on: September 27, 2024
Pixel 5 Versus Pixel 9 Pro XL-Are Android Devices Evolving Towards Better GNSS Performance?
Julián Tomaštík1, Jorge Hernández Olcina2, Šimon Saloň1
1Department of Forest Resources Planning and Informatics, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 96001 Zvolen, Slovakia.
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL shows better Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signal reception than Pixel 5. However, positioning accuracy varied, with Pixel 5 excelling in open areas for single-point positioning.
Area of Science:
- Geomatics Engineering
- Mobile Sensing
- Satellite Navigation
Background:
- Smartphone Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology performance varies significantly across Android devices due to hardware and software disparities.
- Assessing GNSS capabilities in newer smartphone models is crucial for understanding advancements and limitations in mobile positioning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the GNSS signal quality and positioning accuracy of Google Pixel 5 and Pixel 9 Pro XL under diverse environmental conditions.
- To evaluate the impact of improved signal reception on positioning performance in static measurements.
Main Methods:
- Conducted five-hour static GNSS measurements using Google Pixel 5 and Pixel 9 Pro XL.
- Tested performance in three environments: open area, canopy, and indoor.
- Analyzed raw GNSS data focusing on signal quality metrics (e.g., C/N0) and positioning accuracy (Single-Point Positioning and Precise Point Positioning).
Main Results:
- Pixel 9 Pro XL exhibited superior signal completeness, higher carrier-to-noise density (C/N0), and better L5 frequency reception compared to Pixel 5.
- Pixel 5 achieved better mean positional errors in open conditions for Single-Point Positioning (SPP), while Pixel 9 Pro XL performed better under canopy.
- Static methods yielded sub-decimeter accuracy for both devices in optimal conditions; Pixel 9 Pro XL had a higher fix rate.
Conclusions:
- Enhanced signal reception in newer smartphones like Pixel 9 Pro XL does not consistently guarantee superior positioning accuracy.
- Challenges remain in smartphone GNSS, particularly concerning signal quality limitations and achieving precise positioning for mobile applications.
- Future research should focus on software enhancements and external correction sources to improve GNSS accuracy for mobile users.
Related Concept Videos
Errors in Global Positioning System
Field Application of Global Positioning System
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys
Introduction to Global Positioning System
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device
Gyroscope

