Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

289
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
289
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

537
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
537
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

156
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
156
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

176
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
176
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

251
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
251
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test01:19

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

568
The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of...
568

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CBCRisk-Mastectomy: A Prediction Tool to Aid Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision- making.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

CBCRisk-Mastectomy: A Risk Prediction Tool to Aid Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision Making.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Statistical method for pooling categorical biomarker data from multi-center matched/nested case-control studies.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same author

Inference for cause-specific cox model absolute risk in cohort subsampling designs.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same author

Tobacco-related urinary biomarkers and lung cancer risk in women, a case-cohort analysis.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Noninferiority of One HPV Vaccine Dose to Two Doses.

The New England journal of medicine·2025
Same journal

MetaboNet-Bench: A Multi-modal Benchmark for Glucose Forecasting in Type 1 Diabetes.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

A Positron Range Correction with Texture Preservation Framework in PET Imaging.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Automated optimization of force field parameters against ensemble-averaged measurements with Bayesian Inference of Conformational Populations.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Droplet Fusion as a Relaxation Process: Comparison with Shape Recovery of Newtonian and Viscoelastic Droplets.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Ridge-filter crosstalk in conformal proton FLASH planning: dependence on beamlet pitch and iterative mitigation.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Electrochemical DNA Hairpin Sensors for Differentiating Small Molecule Intercalation from Minor Groove Binding.

ArXiv·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K

Statistical method for pooling categorical biomarkers from multi-center matched/nested case-control studies.

Yujie Wu1, Xiao Wu2, Mitchell H Gail3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Arxiv
|July 30, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new statistical method to accurately analyze biomarker data pooled from multiple studies, addressing measurement errors. This approach ensures reliable results for epidemiological research, particularly in understanding disease risks like colorectal cancer.

Keywords:
CalibrationConditional LikelihoodMatched Case-control StudyMeasurement ErrorNested Case-control StudyPooling Project

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.8K
Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
07:41

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases

Published on: May 17, 2019

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.8K
Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
07:41

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases

Published on: May 17, 2019

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiologic research
  • Biomarker analysis
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Pooled analyses increase study power but face challenges from systematic measurement errors in biomarkers across studies.
  • Directly pooling uncalibrated biomarker data can lead to biased regression parameter estimates.
  • Addressing between-study/assay/laboratory variability is crucial for accurate pooled analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a likelihood-based statistical method for evaluating biomarker-disease relationships in pooled data.
  • To account for uncertainties introduced by study-specific calibration processes.
  • To provide valid variance estimation for regression parameters in pooled biomarker studies.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a likelihood-based method for categorical biomarkers in matched/nested case-control studies.
  • Proposed a sandwich variance estimator to address calibration uncertainties.
  • Conducted extensive simulation studies to assess method performance under various conditions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively evaluates biomarker-disease relationships in pooled data.
  • The sandwich variance estimator provides valid asymptotic variances, accounting for calibration uncertainties.
  • Simulation studies confirmed the method's finite sample performance.

Conclusions:

  • The developed statistical approach enables more accurate and reliable analysis of pooled biomarker data.
  • This method is essential for mitigating bias caused by measurement variability in collaborative epidemiologic research.
  • The approach was successfully illustrated using a colorectal cancer and vitamin D pooling project.