Disease outcomes following lateral switch among different CD20-antibodies in active multiple sclerosis

Franziska Axhausen1, Anne Mrochen1, Pia Winter1

  • 1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)
|July 30, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Switching between ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA) for multiple sclerosis (MS) maintains treatment effectiveness. However, switching may lead to faster IgG decline and increased hypogammaglobulinemia risk.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Neurology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA) are approved B-cell depleting therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS).
  • Differences in dosing and administration allow for personalized MS treatment strategies.
  • Limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of switching between OCR and OFA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of switching between OCR and OFA in MS patients.
  • To compare disease activity, B-cell counts, and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in patients who switched therapies versus those who did not.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of MS patients treated with OCR or OFA was conducted.
  • Patients who switched between OCR and OFA (switchers) were matched to controls who received continuous initial B-cell therapy.
  • Effectiveness outcomes, CD19+ B-cell counts, and serum IgG levels were compared between switchers and controls.

Main Results:

  • Effectiveness outcomes were similar between switchers and controls for both OCR and OFA cohorts.
  • B-cell depletion was slightly more pronounced after switching therapies.
  • Switchers showed a faster decline in serum IgG levels, with a higher incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) compared to controls.

Conclusions:

  • Lateral switching between OCR and OFA does not compromise treatment effectiveness in MS patients.
  • Increased IgG loss observed in switchers warrants further investigation into potential niche-specific immunological effects of these therapies.