Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.1K
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

2.3K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.3K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

2.4K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
2.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A practical guide to unbinned unfolding.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2026
Same author

CaloChallenge 2022: a community challenge for fast calorimeter simulation.

Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)·2025
Same author

Isolating Unisolated Upsilons with Anomaly Detection in CMS Open Data.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Automated Approach to Accurate, Precise, and Fast Detector Simulation and Reconstruction.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

The interplay of machine learning-based resonant anomaly detection methods.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2024
Same author

Quantum anomaly detection for collider physics.

Journal of high energy physics : JHEP·2023
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

637

Incorporating Physical Priors into Weakly Supervised Anomaly Detection.

Chi Lung Cheng1,2, Gup Singh2, Benjamin Nachman2,3,4,5

  • 1University of Wisconsin, Department of Physics, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.

Physical Review Letters
|July 31, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new machine learning method called prior-assisted weak supervision (PAWS) to improve anomaly detection. PAWS enhances sensitivity in rare signal searches, outperforming previous methods significantly, especially with noisy data.

More Related Videos

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.7K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

637
Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.7K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • High Energy Physics
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Traditional anomaly detection struggles with rare signals and high-dimensional, noisy data.
  • Weakly supervised methods lack sensitivity when signal models are not precisely known.
  • Existing approaches degrade performance significantly with irrelevant input features.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel machine learning strategy for anomaly detection using weak supervision.
  • To enhance search sensitivity in scenarios with rare signals or numerous unhelpful features.
  • To develop a method robust against irrelevant input dimensions (noise).

Main Methods:

  • Proposed prior-assisted weak supervision (PAWS), a machine learning-based anomaly detection strategy.
  • Incorporated information from a class of signal models into the weak supervision framework.
  • Utilized a mix of semisupervised and weakly supervised learning techniques.

Main Results:

  • PAWS significantly enhances the search sensitivity of weakly supervised anomaly detection.
  • Achieved a factor of 10 increase in sensitivity (cross-section) on the LHC Olympics dataset compared to previous methods.
  • Demonstrated robustness to irrelevant input dimensions, maintaining performance where classical methods degrade by another factor of 10.

Conclusions:

  • PAWS matches the sensitivity of fully supervised methods without requiring exact parameter specification.
  • The method pushes the frontier of sensitivity, bridging model-agnostic and model-specific anomaly searches.
  • PAWS offers a powerful new approach applicable to various anomaly detection scenarios.