Integrating the resist-accept-direct framework into natural resource decision-making processes for climate adaptation

Area of Science:

• Ecology
• Conservation Biology
• Climate Change Adaptation

Background:

• Climate change presents significant challenges to conservation efforts.
• Conservation practitioners often require structured approaches to address climate impacts.
• Existing decision frameworks may not fully incorporate future uncertainties.

Purpose of the Study:

• To evaluate the integration of the Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) framework with established conservation decision-making processes.
• To demonstrate how RAD can enhance climate adaptation planning for conservation practitioners.
• To provide guidance on utilizing RAD to develop diverse portfolios of adaptation actions.

Main Methods:

• The study examined the compatibility of the RAD framework with six common conservation decision frameworks.
• Analysis focused on how RAD can be incorporated into existing structures without necessitating new processes.
• The research explored the creation of adaptation 'menus' and 'portfolios' using RAD.

Main Results:

• The RAD framework can be readily integrated into existing decision processes like structured decision-making, adaptive management, and conservation standards.
• Integration allows for the explicit consideration of future uncertainties in adaptation planning.
• RAD facilitates the development of a broader range of climate adaptation actions.

Conclusions:

• The RAD framework is a valuable tool for enhancing climate adaptation strategies in conservation.
• It empowers practitioners to navigate changing ecosystems by providing a structured approach to selecting and implementing adaptation actions.
• Integrating RAD strengthens existing decision-making tools by incorporating future uncertainties and expanding adaptation options.