Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

08:07
Identification of Plasmodesmal Localization Sequences in Proteins In Planta
Published on: August 15, 2017
8.4K
TISCalling: leveraging machine learning to identify translational initiation sites in plants and viruses
Ming-Ren Yen1, Ya-Ru Li2, Chia-Yi Cheng3,4
1Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115201, Taiwan.
Plant Molecular Biology
|August 1, 2025
Summary
TISCalling identifies novel translation initiation sites (TISs) in plants and viruses using machine learning. This framework prioritizes TISs for further study and reveals key sequence features for TIS determination.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Identifying translational initiation sites (TISs) is crucial for discovering novel proteins and peptides.
- Conventional computational methods struggle with systematic TIS identification, especially non-AUG sites in plants, and evaluating mRNA sequence feature importance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust framework, TISCalling, for systematic and global identification and ranking of novel TISs across eukaryotes.
- To evaluate the importance of mRNA sequence features for TIS determination in plants and mammals.
- To identify novel viral TISs with high predictive power.
Main Methods:
- TISCalling combines machine learning (ML) models and statistical analysis for TIS identification.
- The framework generalizes and ranks features common to plants and mammals, while identifying kingdom-specific features.
- It achieves high predictive power for novel viral TISs.
Main Results:
- TISCalling identifies and ranks novel TISs across eukaryotes, including kingdom-specific features like mRNA secondary structures and G-nucleotide content.
- The framework demonstrates high predictive power for identifying novel viral TISs.
- It provides prediction scores for putative TISs in plant transcripts, enabling prioritization for validation.
Conclusions:
- TISCalling offers a sequence-aware and interpretable approach for decoding genome sequences and exploring functional proteins.
- The framework is available as a command-line package and web tools for broad accessibility.
- It advances the systematic identification of TISs, particularly in plants and viruses.
Keywords:
Gene annotationMachine learning predictionOpen-reading framesTranslation initiation siteTranslational controlMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Leaky Scanning
5.2K
During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA. Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R...
5.2K
Initiation of Translation
34.5K
Initiating translation is complex because it involves multiple molecules. Initiator tRNA, ribosomal subunits, and eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) are all required to assemble on the initiation codon of mRNA. This process consists of several steps that are mediated by different eIFs.
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
34.5K
Improving Translational Accuracy
11.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.9K

