Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Prognostic value of myocardial bridging versus non-obstructive CAD: a long-term follow-up study
Zengfa Huang1, Beibei Cao2, Yang Yang3
1Department of Radiology, Tongji Medical College, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 26 Shengli Avenue, Wuhan, 430014, Hubei, China. hzfz88@163.com.
Insights
Myocardial bridging (MB) does not predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) burden is the primary risk factor for MACE in patients without obstructive CAD.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging and Diagnostics
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Risk Stratification
Background:
- Myocardial bridging (MB) is a congenital anomaly where a segment of a coronary artery travels through the heart muscle.
- The clinical significance of MB, particularly its predictive value for long-term cardiovascular outcomes, remains debated.
- Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) burden is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for adverse events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether myocardial bridging (MB) offers predictive value for long-term cardiovascular events beyond its association with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) burden.
- To assess the independent contribution of MB and non-obstructive CAD burden to the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
Main Methods:
- A multicenter study involving 4176 patients with suspected CAD who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).
- Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between MB, non-obstructive CAD burden, and MACE over a median follow-up of 6.04 years.
- Covariates adjusted for included sex, age, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and diabetes.
Main Results:
- Myocardial bridging (MB) was present in 44% of patients without CAD and 40.5% with non-obstructive CAD.
- The annualized MACE rate was similar between patients with and without MB (1.07% vs. 1.13%).
- Neither MB depth nor length was associated with MACE risk. However, 2-vessel (HR 1.53) and 3-vessel (HR 1.93) non-obstructive CAD significantly predicted MACE after multivariable adjustment.
Conclusions:
- Non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) burden, rather than the presence of myocardial bridging (MB), is the primary predictor of future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients without obstructive CAD.
- Future research should incorporate quality of life measures and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for enhanced risk stratification in MB patients.
Abstract:
We aim to investigate if myocardial bridging (MB) provides predictive value beyond its association with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) burden in a long-term follow-up and multicenter study. This study included 4176 consecutive patients with suspected CAD underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) at two hospitals in Wuhan, China, between September 2016 and December 2017 for finial analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative event-free survival of non-obstructive CAD burden and MB burden classifications, respectively. Further, cox regression models were applied to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for increasing non-obstructive CAD and MB burden classifications. In total, during the 6.04 years (interquartile range 5.73-6.32) follow-up, 276 (6.61%) patients occurred main adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). MB was found in 44% of patients without CAD and in 40.5% of those with non-obstructive CAD. The annualized MACE rate was 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92-1.24) for the no MB group and 1.13 (95% CI: 0.95-1.34) for the MB group. Univarite and Multivariate Cox regression showed that neither the depth nor the length of MB was associated with the risk of MACE. However, after adjusting with sex, age, smoke, drink, hypertension and diabetes, 2-vessel non-obstructive CAD and 3-vessel non-obstructive CAD showed significant association with the risk of MACE, with HR of 1.53 (95% CI: 1.06-2.21, P = 0.023) and 1.93 (95% CI: 1.32-2.82, P = 0.001), respectively, using no CAD as the reference group. Non-obstructive CAD, not presence of MB, is the main predictor of risk for future MACE in patients without obstructive CAD. Prospective registries in the future should include validated quality of life measures and CT-FFR with long-term outcomes to enhance the understanding of symptomatic burden and functional assessment in MB risk stratification.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations

