Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Ground States of the Mean-Field Spin Glass with 3-Spin Couplings
Stefan Boettcher1, Ginger E Lau1
1Emory University, Department of Physics, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Abstract:
We use heuristic optimization methods in extensive computations to determine with low systematic error ground-state configurations of the mean-field p-spin glass model with p=3. Here, all possible triplets in a system of N Ising spins are connected with a bond. This model has been of recent interest, since it exhibits the "overlap gap condition," which should make it prohibitive to find ground states asymptotically with local search methods when compared, for instance, with the p=2 case better known as the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model (SKM). Indeed, it proves more costly to find good approximations for p=3 than for the SKM, even for our heuristic. Compared to the SKM, the ground-state behavior for p=3 is quite distinct also in other ways. For the SKM, finite-size corrections for large system sizes N→∞, of both the ensemble average over ground-state energy densities and the width of their distribution, vary anomalously with noninteger exponents. In the p=3 case here, the energy density and its distribution appear to scale with lnN/N and 1/N corrections, respectively. The distribution itself is consistent with a Gumbel form. Even more stark is the contrast for the bond-diluted case, where the SKM has shown previously a notable variation of the anomalous corrections exponent with the bond density, while for p=3 no such variation is found here. Hence, for the 3-spin model, all measured corrections scale the same as for the random energy model (REM), corresponding to p=∞. This would suggest that all p-spin models with p≥3 exhibit the same ground-state corrections as in the REM.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution

