Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

11.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.9K
In-vitro Mutagenesis01:16

In-vitro Mutagenesis

14.2K
To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
14.2K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.4K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autoinhibitory feedback preserves intestinal stem cell maintenance and fate commitment.

The EMBO journal·2026
Same author

Representation learning of single-cell RNA-seq data.

RNA (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Immunoglobulin heavy-chain status and stromal interactions shape ferroptosis sensitivity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Signal transduction and targeted therapy·2026
Same author

Two distinct chromatin modules regulate proinflammatory gene expression.

Nature cell biology·2025
Same author

Author Correction: Cross-species comparison reveals therapeutic vulnerabilities halting glioblastoma progression.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

RNA-binding proteins mediate the maturation of chromatin topology during differentiation.

Nature cell biology·2025
Same journal

RNAbpFlow: base pair-augmented SE(3) flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Spatio-DARLIN enables robust and efficient in situ lineage tracing in mice at single-cell resolution.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

EasyGrid: a versatile platform for automated cryo-EM sample preparation and quality control.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Cloud-based microscope enables live neuroimaging for 24 h and beyond with worldwide access.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Deep molecular profiling in three dimensions.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

3D pathology-guided microdissection.

Nature methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

500

Deep-learning-based gene perturbation effect prediction does not yet outperform simple linear baselines.

Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze1,2,3, Wolfgang Huber4, Simon Anders5

  • 1BioQuant, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. constantin.ahlmann@embl.de.

Nature Methods
|August 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning foundation models struggle to predict genetic perturbation effects on single-cell data. Simple baseline models performed better, emphasizing the need for rigorous benchmarking in developing new computational methods.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

900
In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

20.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

500
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

900
In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio
12:31

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

20.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Genomics
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Deep learning foundation models aim to interpret complex biological data, including single-cell transcriptomics.
  • Predicting gene expression changes after genetic perturbations is crucial for understanding cellular function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of deep learning foundation models in predicting transcriptome alterations.
  • To compare these advanced models against simpler baseline approaches for genetic perturbation prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed five foundation models and two other deep learning models.
  • Benchmarked model performance against simple predictive baselines.
  • Focused on predicting transcriptome changes following single and double genetic perturbations.

Main Results:

  • No deep learning foundation models outperformed the simple baseline methods.
  • The predictive accuracy for transcriptome changes was not improved by complex models.
  • This suggests limitations in current deep learning approaches for this specific task.

Conclusions:

  • Current deep learning foundation models do not surpass simple baselines for predicting genetic perturbation outcomes.
  • Rigorous benchmarking is essential for evaluating and guiding the development of new computational tools in systems biology.
  • Future research should focus on improving model interpretability and predictive power for complex biological systems.