Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180° Curved Artery Test Section
Published on: July 19, 2016
Re-Exploration of Flow Rate in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
Sara Hungerford1,2,3, Eleanor Rye1, Hari Sritharan1
1Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Background:
Transaortic flow rate (TFR, mL/s) is an emerging hemodynamic index in aortic stenosis (AS), offering insights beyond stroke volume index (SVi). We evaluated the hemodynamic determinants and prognostic significance of TFR at rest and peak dobutamine stress in patients with suspected low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) AS and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%).
Aims:
This study aimed to assess and compare the hemodynamic determinants of TFR at rest and during peak pharmacological stress, and to evaluate their association with 3-year survival.
Methods:
Among 86 patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), 34 were classified as true severe, eight as pseudo-severe, and 44 as indeterminate AS. TFR and associated parameters were assessed at rest and stress, and survival was evaluated at 3 years.
Results:
At rest, no significant between-group differences in TFR were observed (p = 0.11). However, at peak stress, TFR differed significantly between groups: true severe (226 ± 62 mL/s), pseudo-severe (334 ± 55 mL/s), and indeterminate (248 ± 67 mL/s; p < 0.01). Rest TFR was independently associated with cardiac output (CO), arterial compliance, and valvulo-arterial impedance (ZVA). During stress, TFR was predominantly associated with CO, although systemic vascular properties remained significant in pseudo-severe AS. Flow reserve (ΔTFR) was influenced only by stress-derived variables. At 3-year follow-up, stress TFR was a significant predictor of survival (p = 0.03), independent of AS classification (p = 0.04) and intervention (p = 0.04). A stress TFR > 195 mL/s was the optimal survival threshold (AUC 0.64; sensitivity 85%, specificity 70%).
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that stress TFR reflects left ventricular contractile reserve and carries prognostic value in LF-LG AS. Stress-based assessment may enhance clinical decision-making, particularly in diagnostically ambiguous AS subsets.
More Related Videos
04:48Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
09:24O-Ring Aortic Banding Versus Traditional Transverse Aortic Constriction for Modeling Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
Published on: October 6, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation....