Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neuroplasticity01:01

Neuroplasticity

Neuroplasticity reflects the brain's remarkable capacity to adapt and evolve, responding dynamically to learning, experiences, or injury by reorganizing its neural circuitry. This reorganization involves creating new neural connections and refining old ones through a series of biological processes that contribute to the brain's lifelong development and adaptability.
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ABR findings in inner ear anomaly subgroups: Influence of cochlear nerve deficiency.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

The multidimensional effects of sleep quality in young adults: the relationship between auditory performance, sound tolerance, and anxiety.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

Language and Memory Skills in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2025
Same author

Can a large language model inform patients about auditory brainstem implants?

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2025
Same author

Does listening behavior shape middle-ear function? A wideband tympanometry study in headphone users.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2025
Same author

Comparison of bucket test and mobile application in pediatric utricular function assessment: a cross-sectional study.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.2K

Neural Correlates of Masking Level Differences: Evidence From Auditory Brainstem Responses.

Aysenur Aykul Yagcioglu1,2, Aysegul Esdogan1, Aysun Parlak Kocabay3

  • 1Department of Audiology, KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkey.

Brain and Behavior
|August 5, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Masking level difference (MLD) performance is linked to auditory brainstem response (ABR) Wave V latency in adults. This suggests midbrain structures are vital for binaural processing and MLD can assess brainstem function.

Keywords:
auditory brainstem responsebinaural integrationbrainstem processingmasking level difference

More Related Videos

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.5K
Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.2K
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.5K
Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
08:51

Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice

Published on: May 10, 2019

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Masking Level Differences (MLD) assess binaural hearing.
  • Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) reflect neural activity from the auditory nerve to the midbrain.
  • Understanding the neural basis of MLD is crucial for diagnosing auditory processing disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of MLD by examining their relationship with ABR in normal-hearing adults.
  • To elucidate the brainstem mechanisms underlying MLD performance.

Main Methods:

  • 37 normal-hearing adults (18-30 years) underwent audiometry, MLD testing (500 Hz, S₀N₀/SπN₀), and click-evoked ABR.
  • Spearman's correlation analyzed relationships between ABR latencies/interpeak intervals and MLD scores.
  • Multiple linear regression assessed the predictive power of ABR components on MLD.

Main Results:

  • Mean MLD was 13.24 ± 2.18 dB, indicating normal performance.
  • A moderate positive correlation (r=0.58, p<0.001) was found between ABR Wave V latency and MLD scores.
  • ABR Wave V latency significantly predicted MLD scores, explaining 28% of the variance.

Conclusions:

  • MLD performance is associated with ABR Wave V latency, implicating midbrain structures like the inferior colliculus in binaural processing.
  • MLD serves as a behavioral index of brainstem integrity.
  • MLD testing may provide diagnostic insights into auditory brainstem dysfunction.