Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Acid Suppression in Mild-Moderate Laryngomalacia Without GERD: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Amber D Shaffer1, Zainab Balogun1, Allison B J Tobey1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Objective:
To determine the efficacy of acid suppression therapy (AST) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and airway symptoms in infants with mild to moderate laryngomalacia.
Methods:
From 2020 to 2023, infants ≤ 6 months old with laryngomalacia at a tertiary children's hospital were randomized to famotidine and feeding modifications (AST) or feeding modifications alone (no-AST). Laryngomalacia Airway Symptom Score (LASS) and Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ-R) were completed by guardians. Of 343 patients approached, 257 were excluded due to severe laryngomalacia on LASS, severe GER (I-GERQ-R ≥ 16), prior AST, no laryngomalacia on laryngoscopy, recommendation for supraglottoplasty, and/or other airway anomalies. Twenty-one declined participation. LASS and I-GERQ-R were again completed 1-6 months following enrollment.
Results:
Sixty-five patients enrolled; 40/65 (62%) followed up at a mean of 3.1 months (SD 1.4 months). Of these 40, 10 (25%) had mild and 30 (75%) had moderate laryngomalacia. Median I-GERQ-R was 11 (range 5-15) at the initial appointment and 7.5 (range 0-26) at follow-up (p = 0.002). Laryngomalacia resolved in 13/40 (33%) at follow-up based on LASS (p < 0.001). Patients randomized to AST (n = 20) and no-AST (n = 20) had comparable improvement on LASS (p = 0.3) and I-GERQ-R (p = 0.8). Additionally, the severity of laryngomalacia at initial consult did not have a significant impact on LASS (p = 0.3) or I-GERQ-R (p = 0.8) improvement. LASS (ρ = 0.423, p = 0.007) but not I-GERQ-R (ρ = 0.122, p = 0.5) improved more with longer time from consult to follow-up.
Conclusion:
This small randomized controlled trial was unable to demonstrate additional benefit from AST compared to feeding modifications alone based on airway and reflux symptoms.
Trial Registration:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04614974.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Histamine H2-Receptor Antagonists
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Antacids
However, this neutralization reaction between...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Antitussives, Expectorants, and Mucolytics
Antitussives include codeine, dextromethorphan (Robitussin), and benzonatate (Tessalon). Codeine and dextromethorphan exert their effects centrally by suppressing the cough reflex center in the medulla. Benzonatate operates peripherally within the respiratory tract by...
Antiasthma Drugs: Leukotriene Modifiers
Leukotriene modifiers work through two distinct mechanisms:

