Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Information management under stigma: When protective silence complements willful ignorance
Fiona Eyraud1, Olivier Klein1, Annalisa Casini2
1Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Université libre de Bruxelles, Avenue Franklin Roosevelt 50 - CP 122, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium.
This study explores protective silence, a strategy where people withhold information to avoid stigma, particularly in intimate partner violence within LGBTQ+ and Black communities. Understanding this social defense is crucial for addressing harm and informing interventions.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Sociology
- Public Health
Background:
- Protective silence involves withholding information to shield oneself or a group from stigma.
- Willful ignorance is an individual defense mechanism involving avoidance of information.
- Intimate partner violence (IPV) in LGBTQ+ and Black communities highlights the impact of social and structural pressures on information management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine protective silence as a complementary strategy to willful ignorance.
- To understand how social and structural pressures influence information management in IPV contexts.
- To develop an integrated theoretical framework for strategic ignorance.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of evidence from intimate partner violence in LGBTQ+ and Black communities.
- Examination of information management strategies in response to stigma.
- Comparative analysis of protective silence and willful ignorance.
Main Results:
- Social and structural pressures significantly shape information management, contributing to bias and harm.
- Protective silence functions as a social defense mechanism, analogous to the individual defense of willful ignorance.
- Withholding information can perpetuate harm by obscuring underlying issues.
Conclusions:
- An integrated theoretical framework is needed to understand the relational and contextual roots of strategic ignorance.
- Findings have implications for research, intervention, and policy development related to IPV and stigma.
- Addressing protective silence requires understanding its social and structural determinants.
More Related Videos
08:42Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Repressed Memory
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Groupthink
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...