Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Avocado Sample Preparation Using the QuEChERS Method with Ammonium Formate for Pesticide Analysis
Published on: December 8, 2023
Performance of Visual Inspection, ATP, and Microbial Analysis in Evaluating Cleaning and Sanitizing of Surfaces in an
J A Muñiz-Flores1, J A Pérez-Montaño1, M A Pineda-Macias1
1Departamento de Farmacobiología, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Blvd. Marcelino García Barragán 1421, C.P. 44430, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Abstract:
Effective cleaning and sanitizing (C&S) of food contact surfaces (FCSs) is critical for minimizing microbial contamination risks in fresh produce environments. This study evaluated the performance of visual inspection, ATP bioluminescence, and microbial analysis as verification tools for C&S procedures in an avocado packing plant, based on surface conditions before and after sanitation. Cleanliness was classified using a four-level visual scale, from 1 (cleanest) to 4 (dirtiest). ATP levels were measured via bioluminescence. Microbial analysis included the quantification of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and yeasts and molds, as well as the qualitative detection of Listeria spp. Surface temperatures ranged from 17 °C to 30.9 °C, and relative humidity from 54.3% to 97.0%. Brushes and receiving crates showed the highest visual scores after C&S; however, receiving crates exhibited minimal improvement compared to pre-C&S levels. ATP levels ranged from 2.6 ± 0.7 to 3.8 ± 1.0 log10 relative light units (RLU)/100 cm2, with no significant reductions observed. Microbial counts showed inconsistent decreases, and no surface achieved the expected 3-log reduction. Listeria spp. was detected on 14% and 13% of FCS before and after C&S, respectively. Noncontact surfaces, especially drains, also remained contaminated. Notably, the verification tools often produced contradictory results. In some surfaces, visual inspection and microbial indicators suggested effective C&S, while ATP readings showed no significant change. In others, only visual improvements were detected, with no corroborating reduction in ATP or microbial levels. These inconsistencies underscore the limitations of relying on a single method and highlight the importance of using complementary tools in a sequential verification approach. A decision tree (Fig. 4) is proposed to guide the integration of these tools and improve hygiene monitoring strategies in produce packing environments.
More Related Videos
09:30Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
05:49Tracking Microbial Contamination in Retail Environments Using Fluorescent Powder - A Retail Delicatessen Environment Example
Published on: March 5, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control
Handwashing II: Pre-procedure and Initial Procedure Steps
The hand washing procedure itself includes the following steps. First, cover cuts, if any, on hands with a waterproof dressing. Cuts and abrasions can become contaminated with bacteria hindering the ability to clean the area thoroughly. In addition, repeated hand washing can worsen an injury. The nails must be short and clean, without nail...
Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps