Large Language Models for Detection of Genetic Variants in Biomedical Literature
Marie Wosny1,2, Janna Hastings1,2,3
1School of Medicine, University of St.Gallen (HSG).
Abstract:
Personalized medicine relies on understanding genetic variations, but systematically tracking literature linking these variations to clinical outcomes remains challenging. This study assessed the feasibility and performance of large language models (LLMs) in extracting genes and variants from prostate cancer literature. Four LLMs, including LLaMA 3.3, GPT-4o, and DeepSeek-V3, were evaluated, with LLaMA-3.3-70b demonstrating the highest overall performance (98% precision, 92% recall, 99% accuracy). In contrast, conventional information extraction methods had poor recall and high false positive rates. Moreover, LLMs inferred contextual details, offering enriched insights but occasionally introducing unsupported information. These findings demonstrate the promise of LLMs in automating genomic variant extraction, while also highlighting the need for rigorous validation and careful integration into clinical and research workflows.
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Lingo
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Genomics
Leaky Scanning


