Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs
Published on: April 9, 2021
Emergency temporary standards and COVID-19 trends among Oregon farmworkers
Raul Cruz-Cano1, Devon C Payne-Sturges2
1Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Emergency Temporary Standards (ETSs) targeting all workplaces reduced COVID-19 cases, unlike those specifically for farmworkers. Policy design and implementation for farmworker protections need re-evaluation to improve effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Occupational Health
Background:
- Migrant and seasonal farmworkers are essential to US agriculture but faced increased SARS-CoV-2 exposure risks due to housing and transport conditions.
- Farmworker advocates pushed for emergency temporary standards (ETSs) to mitigate COVID-19 risks.
- Limited research exists on the effectiveness of specific interventions for protecting farmworkers during the pandemic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of Oregon's COVID-19 emergency temporary standards (ETSs) and an executive order on transmission rates.
- To assess the effectiveness of policies targeting farmworker housing, transportation, and worksites versus general workplace regulations.
Main Methods:
- An interrupted time series analysis was employed to examine COVID-19 trends.
- Data spanned from March 1, 2020, to February 27, 2021, in Oregon.
- Analysis included the general population and agricultural labor groups.
Main Results:
- ETSs and an executive order targeting farmworker-specific conditions showed no significant impact on COVID-19 cases or deaths.
- An ETS targeting all workplaces demonstrated significant decreases in COVID-19 cases across various worker groups, including general population, producers, hired, unpaid, and migrant workers.
- No policy interventions significantly impacted COVID-19-associated deaths.
Conclusions:
- A general workplace ETS was more effective in reducing COVID-19 transmission than policies narrowly focused on farmworkers.
- The design, communication, and implementation strategies for farmworker-specific ETSs require re-evaluation for improved efficacy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Standards of Care I
Principles of Disease Surveillance

