Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

09:55
Neuroimaging-Guided TMS–EEG for Real-Time Cortical Network Mapping
Published on: June 13, 2025
1.1K
Deep brain stimulation-induced local evoked potentials outperform spectral features in spatial and clinical STN
Enrico Opri1, Faical Isbaine2, Seyyed Bahram Borgheai3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
Journal of Neural Engineering
|August 8, 2025
Summary
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) induced local evoked potentials (DLEP) offer superior subthalamic nucleus (STN) spatial accuracy for Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment. DLEP provide better correlation with post-operative programming outcomes than traditional spectral features.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Neurological Surgery
Background:
- Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a key Parkinson's disease (PD) therapy.
- Optimizing STN DBS lead placement and stimulation programming remains a clinical challenge.
- Current methods use imaging and microelectrode recordings (MER), with programming relying on time-consuming trial-and-error.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare DBS-induced local evoked potentials (DLEP) with traditional spectral features for STN mapping.
- To evaluate DLEP's accuracy in localizing the STN and predicting post-operative programming outcomes.
- To develop methods for artifact-free DLEP recovery and amplitude estimation at stimulating contacts.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated DLEP in 39 STN DBS leads from 31 PD subjects using single-pulse and high-frequency (HF) burst stimulation.
- Developed a novel artifact-removal technique for monopolar DLEP recovery and amplitude estimation.
- Compared DLEP and spectral features (beta, high-frequency oscillations [HFOs], aperiodic components) against imaging and MER localization and clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- DLEP demonstrated high STN spatial consistency (100% for single-pulse, 84.62% for burst), outperforming beta (89.74%) and HFO (82.05%) spectral measures.
- DLEP correlated better with clinical outcomes (single-pulse ρ = -0.33, HF burst ρ = -0.26) than spectral measures (beta ρ = -0.25, HFO ρ = 0.05).
- Single-pulse, low-frequency stimulation proved sufficient for DLEP-based STN mapping.
Conclusions:
- DLEP offer superior STN spatial specificity and correlation with post-operative programming compared to spectral features.
- Developed artifact-removal and amplitude estimation methods facilitate clinical translation of DLEP.
- DLEP are a robust, clinically valuable marker for DBS targeting and programming, potentially reflecting STN excitability.

