Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Detergent-free Ultrafast Reconstitution of Membrane Proteins into Lipid Bilayers Using Fusogenic Complementary-charged Proteoliposomes.
Published on: April 5, 2018
Efficient extraction of two different sulfonamide antibiotics from lipstick by magnetic solid-phase extraction based
Xiao Dai1, Xianhong Zhu1, Shiyu Li1
1Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresources and Environment, Co-Innovation Center of Jiangsu Marine Bio-industry Technology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Marine Pharmaceutical Compound Screening, Jiangsu Key Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang, 222005, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory on Innovation for Marine Medicine and Modern Chinese Medicine, Lianyungang, 222005, China.
Abstract:
Some illegal businesses often add antibiotics such as sulfonamides to expand the functional range of lipstick. However, the abuse of antibiotics will lead to serious adverse reactions and increase the drug resistance of bacteria. To ensure the safety of lipstick, it is necessary to monitor the antibiotic content, which urgently needs to develop an efficient and highly sensitive analytical method. In this study, a magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) method was developed using a composite adsorbent based on carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (c-MMWCNT) and carbon dots (CDs) for sample pretreatment. A magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography method was established using silanized serine‑modified carbon dots (Sil-Ser-OCDs) as the sorbent for the determination of sulfapyridine (SPY) and sulfamethazine (SMT). Key extraction parameters including adsorbent dosage, extraction time, and pH were optimized using response surface methodology. The optimal extraction conditions were determined to be an adsorbent dosage of 72 mg, extraction time of 4.5 min, and pH 6.0. Under the optimal conditions, the recoveries of SPY and SMT were in the range of 88.0%-93.4%, and the RSD values of intra-day and inter-day precision were under 4.2% and 5.4%, respectively, indicating that the approach has excellent accuracy and precision.

