Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Digital twins in increasing diversity in clinical trials: A systematic review
Abigail Tubbs1, Enrique Alvarez Vazquez1
1Biomedical Engineering, University of North Dakota, 501 N Columbia Road, Grand Forks, 58202-8380, ND, United States.
Abstract:
The integration of digital twin (DT) technology and artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical trials holds transformative potential for addressing persistent inequities in participant representation. This systematic review evaluates the role of these technologies in improving diversity, particularly in racial, ethnic, gender, age, and socioeconomic dimensions, minimizing bias, and allowing personalized medicine in clinical research settings. Evidence from 90 studies reveals that digital twins offer dynamic simulation capabilities for trial design, while AI facilitates predictive analytics and recruitment optimization. However, implementation remains hindered by fragmented regulatory frameworks, biased datasets, and infrastructural disparities. Ethical concerns,including privacy, consent, and algorithmic opacity, further complicate the deployment. Inclusive data practices identified in the literature include the use of demographically representative training data, participatory data collection frameworks, and equity audits to detect and correct systemic bias. Fairness in AI and DT models is primarily operationalized through group fairness metrics such as demographic parity and equalized odds, along with fairness, aware model training and validation. Key gaps include the lack of global standards, underrepresentation in model training, and challenges in real-world adoption. To overcome these barriers, the review proposes actionable directions: developing inclusive data practices, harmonizing regulatory oversight, and embedding fairness into computational model design. By focusing on diversity as a design principle, AI and DT technologies can support a more equitable and generalizable future for clinical research.
More Related Videos
09:57Development and Evaluation of 3D-Printed Cardiovascular Phantoms for Interventional Planning and Training
Published on: January 18, 2021
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Case Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Preclinical Development: Overview