Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Exploring tools and measures for evaluating the quality of paid disability support for adults: a scoping review
Megan Topping1,2, Jacinta Douglas3,2, Di Winkler3,2
1Summer Foundation, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia megan.topping@summerfoundation.org.au.
Introduction:
The quality of paid disability support services has significant implications for the autonomy, well-being and community participation of adults with disability. However, variability in service provision and evaluation persists. Despite the growing public investment and focus on improving support quality, there appears to remain a lack of comprehensive tools and measures to evaluate the quality of paid disability support. This scoping review aims to systematically identify and map the existing tools and measures used to evaluate the quality of paid disability support for adults with disability.
Methods And Analysis:
This scoping review will be conducted following the methodology outlined by Arksey and O'Malley, enhancements proposed by Levac et al and the Joanna Briggs Institute along with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The research question guiding the review is: 'What existing tools and measures are available to evaluate the quality of paid disability support services?' Comprehensive searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus to identify peer-reviewed articles published in English since 2014. Supplementary grey literature searches will also be conducted, alongside an online survey to obtain stakeholder input. Articles or grey literature sources that report on tools or measures for evaluating paid disability support for adults (aged 18-65 years) with disability will be included. Data extraction will focus on study characteristics, participant demographics and the characteristics of the quality of support measurement tools. A narrative synthesis will be used to present the findings.
Ethics And Dissemination:
Ethical approval will be obtained for the online stakeholder survey component of the review. No ethical approval is required for the scoping review of the literature. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and accessible formats to ensure a wide audience is reached, including researchers, policymakers and disability service providers.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Continuing Care
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Quality Assurance

