Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

312
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
312
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

519
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
519
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

310
Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
310
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

575
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
575
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

207
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
207
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development01:14

Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development

786
The sensorimotor stage, the initial phase of Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development, spans the first two years of a child's life. During this period, infants actively engage with their surroundings, building cognitive awareness through direct interaction with the world. This interaction is primarily based on sensory perception and motor actions, allowing infants to gradually understand basic physical properties and predict how objects interact within their environment.
Exploration...
786

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissociating the behavioral and computational features of implicit motor learning and explicit perturbation detection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Dissociating variability from error-based processes in observational learning.

Human movement science·2026
Same author

Imitation performance biases are moderated by perceived accuracy in golf putting.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Dual agonist and antagonist muscle vibration produces a bias in end point with no change in variability.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same author

The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same author

Evidence for an efferent-based prediction contributing to implicit motor adaptation.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

1.8K

Causal inference, prediction and state estimation in sensorimotor learning.

Hyosub E Kim1, Romeo Chua2, Davin Hu2

  • 1Kinesiology; Neuroscience, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada.

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|August 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain learns from movement errors by distinguishing between internal motor noise and external visual disturbances. A new Bayesian model, PIECE, explains how we adapt to external errors while ignoring self-generated ones.

Keywords:
Bayesian modellingcausal inferencedecision-makingmotor adaptationmotor learningstate estimation

More Related Videos

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

21.3K
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

1.8K
Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

21.3K
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Computational Theory

Background:

  • The sensorimotor system must differentiate between self-generated errors and external perturbations to effectively learn and adapt movements.
  • Previous research indicates humans ignore internally generated reaching errors (motor noise) but adapt to external errors (visual perturbations).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To formalize the understanding of how the brain parses movement errors into internal and external components.
  • To propose and validate a novel Bayesian decision-making model for sensorimotor adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • Replication of previous findings with 16 neurotypical adults.
  • Development of the Parsing of Internal and External Causes of Error (PIECE) model, a Bayesian decision-making framework.
  • Comparison of the PIECE model against three established hand-to-target alignment models.

Main Results:

  • The PIECE model accurately captures the precise parsing of internal versus external errors observed in human behavior.
  • Motor corrections are shown to reflect state estimation and belief in external perturbation.
  • The PIECE model outperforms hand-to-target alignment models in explaining the observed error parsing.

Conclusions:

  • Sensorimotor adaptation involves causal inference about the error source, challenging theories focused solely on hand-to-target alignment.
  • The nervous system effectively discounts intrinsic motor noise while adapting to external perturbations.
  • The PIECE model provides a normative explanation for maintaining finely calibrated movements.