Levels of Flow at Work among Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Peishuang Wang1, Rui Gao1, Xinyan Zhuang1
1School of Nursing, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Aim:
To systematically evaluate the available literature on the overall levels of flow at work among nurses.
Background:
Nurses are the core members of the medical team, who are confronted with considerable pressure, job burnout, and a high level of intention to leave. As flow refers to the optimal experiences that are the most enjoyable in human life when engaged in an activity with full involvement, a higher level of flow at work can help reduce work pressure, alleviate burnout, promote personal growth, and further improve the quality of nursing.
Method:
A search was conducted on the Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, WOS, CINAHL, and Chinese databases, including the China Biomedical Literature (SinoMed), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, and Weipu databases, from the inception of the databases until October 2024. Two researchers independently conducted the literature screens, quality assessments, and data extraction on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria and evaluated the risk of bias. A random-effects model was employed to achieve pooled estimates of work-related flow scales via Stata18.0 software.
Results:
The pooled mean score of the work-related flow scale was 3.44 (95% CI, 3.28-3.60). Eleven studies reported scores for the subdimensions of absorption, work enjoyment, and intrinsic motivation, with scores of 3.38 (95% CI, 3.09-3.68), 3.12 (95% CI, 2.88-3.36), and 3.28 (95% CI, 3.00-3.56), respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested that nurses in China, nurses in general departments (internal medicine and surgery), and nurses ≤35 years of age might have experienced lower levels of flow at work. Additionally, studies with large sample sizes tended to report high levels of flow at work; studies published from 2019 to 2022 reported slightly higher levels of flow at work scores. Meta-regression further revealed that the country, mean age, and department of the participants might be the sources of heterogeneity.
Conclusion:
This review is the first to synthesize published research and calculate a pooled score of flow at work among nurses. The results indicated that nurses reported a medium level of flow at work, with significant heterogeneity.
Implications For Nursing Policy:
Policy makers and managers should dynamically monitor the level of nurses' flow at work and incorporate it into the reference index system to measure and promote nurses' personal career development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Flow Sheet
Here's a closer look at the examples of flowsheets commonly used by nurses:
Graphic Sheet Documentation:
Current Trends in Nursing II
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Current Trends in Nursing I
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics


