Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Developing and validating a rubric-based approach to quality assurance in Turkish higher education
Buket Akkoyunlu1, Salih Bardakcı2, Sibel Aksu Yıldırım2
1Çankaya University, Türkiye.
A new rubric effectively evaluates higher education quality assurance (QA) processes. Developed by the Turkish Higher Education Quality Council, this tool ensures robust, reliable, and valid assessments for institutional improvement.
Area of Science:
- Higher Education Studies
- Quality Assurance in Education
- Educational Measurement and Evaluation
Background:
- Effective quality assurance (QA) in higher education necessitates methodologically sound evaluation tools aligned with international standards.
- A structured, transparent, and consistent assessment framework is crucial for institutional QA processes.
- The Turkish Higher Education Quality Council (THEQC) identified a need for a validated rubric to assess higher education QA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a rubric-based approach for evaluating institutional quality assurance (QA) processes in Turkish higher education.
- To create a comprehensive evaluation tool encompassing leadership, learning, research, and societal service domains.
- To ensure the rubric is responsive to institutional needs and aligns with global QA benchmarks.
Main Methods:
- The rubric was developed iteratively, integrating expert feedback, international benchmarks, site visits, and prior research.
- It comprises 22 main criteria and 46 sub-criteria assessed on a five-point maturity scale.
- Validity and reliability were tested through content validity assessments (n=10 QA professionals), construct/criterion validity (n=252 evaluators across 57 institutions), and 360-degree feedback.
Main Results:
- The rubric demonstrated strong content validity (Lawshe coefficient = 1.00, p < .05) and high interrater consistency.
- Usability analyses confirmed the tool's effectiveness across diverse evaluator groups and institutional contexts.
- The developed rubric proved to be a robust and applicable instrument for QA evaluation.
Conclusions:
- The study successfully developed and validated a reliable and valid rubric for assessing higher education quality assurance.
- The rubric provides a structured framework to enhance and evaluate QA practices within the Turkish higher education system.
- This tool supports institutional self-improvement and accountability in higher education quality assurance.
More Related Videos
03:07Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Reliability and Validity
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Improving Translational Accuracy