Survival Modelling Using Machine Learning and Immune-Nutritional Profiles in Advanced Gastric Cancer on Home
Konrad Matysiak1,2, Aleksandra Hojdis2, Magdalena Szewczuk2,3
1Centre for Intestinal Failure, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznań, Poland.
Nutrients
|August 14, 2025
Summary
Nutritional status and immune markers like the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) predict survival in advanced gastric cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Machine learning models enhance this prognostic capability.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nutrition Science
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Patients with stage IV gastric cancer and chronic intestinal failure necessitate home parenteral nutrition (HPN).
- Assessing prognostic factors is crucial for managing these complex patients.
- Nutritional and immune-inflammatory biomarkers offer potential predictive value.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic significance of nutritional and immune-inflammatory biomarkers in stage IV gastric cancer patients receiving HPN.
- To develop an individualized survival prediction model using machine learning.
- To identify key predictors of overall survival.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of 410 stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma patients initiating HPN (2015-2023).
- Assessment of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR).
- Application of Cox proportional hazards models and a Random Survival Forest (RSF) machine learning model.
Main Results:
- Both CONUT score and LMR were independent predictors of overall survival.
- Higher CONUT scores correlated with increased mortality risk (HR=1.656), while higher LMR values were protective (HR=0.632).
- The RSF model showed high predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.985-0.986), with CONUT score being the primary prognostic factor.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning applied to immune-nutritional data provides a robust method for survival prediction in advanced gastric cancer patients on HPN.
- This approach aids in risk stratification and personalized clinical decision-making for nutritional support and treatment intensity.
- CONUT score and LMR integration into predictive models can optimize patient management.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
455
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
455
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
284
Enteral nutrition encompasses various methods of delivering nutrition directly to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, bypassing traditional oral intake. It is particularly beneficial for patients who cannot eat by mouth but have a functioning digestive system. Key methods include nasointestinal feeding, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy, each suited to different clinical scenarios based on the patient's needs and condition.
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
284


