Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

449
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
449
Inertial Frames of Reference01:03

Inertial Frames of Reference

7.4K
Newton’s first law is usually considered to be a statement about reference frames. It provides a method for identifying a special type of reference frame: the inertial reference frame. In principle, we can make the net force on a body zero. If its velocity relative to a given frame is constant, then that frame is said to be inertial. So, by definition, an inertial reference frame is a reference frame where Newton's first law holds valid. Newton's first law applies to objects with...
7.4K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

533
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
533
Equations of Motion: Normal and Tangetial Components01:10

Equations of Motion: Normal and Tangetial Components

570
Describing the motion of a particle along a curvilinear path involves understanding its components in terms of normal and tangential aspects. The normal component aligns with the radial direction of the curve at a specific point, reflecting changes in the trajectory of the velocity vector. In contrast, the tangential component is tangential to the curve at that point and signifies the rate at which speed alters along the path.
Newton's second law of motion is employed to articulate the...
570
Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

374
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
374
Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components01:23

Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components

628
Curvilinear motion characterizes the movement of a particle or object along a curved path, notably evident when envisioning a car navigating a winding road. If the car starts at point A, its position vector is established within a fixed frame of reference, where the ratio of the position vector to its magnitude signifies the unit vector pointing in the position vector's direction.
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the...
628

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adaptive Robust Unscented Kalman Filter for AUV Acoustic Navigation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
Same author

Reply.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders·2018
Same author

Identification and Functional Analysis of Long Intergenic Non-coding RNAs Underlying Intramuscular Fat Content in Pigs.

Frontiers in genetics·2018
Same author

Quantitative determination of residual 1,4-dioxane in three-dimensional printed bone scaffold.

Journal of orthopaedic translation·2018
Same author

Imaging through scattering layers exceeding memory effect range with spatial-correlation-achieved point-spread-function.

Optics letters·2018
Same author

Protective role of puerarin on LPS/D-Gal induced acute liver injury via restoring autophagy.

American journal of translational research·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.3K

Adaptive Covariance Matrix for UAV-Based Visual-Inertial Navigation Systems Using Gaussian Formulas.

Yangzi Cong1, Wenbin Su2, Nan Jiang1

  • 1Institute of Space Sciences, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an adaptive covariance matrix method for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) visual-inertial navigation systems (VINS). The approach enhances drone navigation accuracy and robustness in challenging conditions like motion blur.

Keywords:
adaptive covariance matrixdrones/UAVimage quality assessmentmotion blurvisual–inertial navigation system

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
08:47

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.6K
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.3K
Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
08:47

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation

Published on: February 9, 2024

1.6K
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems
  • Computer Vision
  • Navigation Systems

Background:

  • Visual-Inertial Navigation Systems (VINS) are critical for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) applications.
  • Traditional VINS face limitations in adapting to environmental changes due to fixed covariance matrices.
  • High-speed drone operations with motion blur and poor image clarity degrade VINS accuracy and robustness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an adaptive covariance matrix estimation method for UAV-based VINS.
  • To improve navigation accuracy and system robustness under varying image quality conditions.
  • To address the challenges posed by motion blur in high-speed drone navigation.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed an adaptive covariance matrix estimation method using Gaussian formulas for UAV-based VINS.
  • Utilized the Laplacian operator for detailed assessment of image blur and quality.
  • Implemented a novel mechanism for dynamically adjusting the visual covariance matrix based on image clarity.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method demonstrated significant improvements in drone navigation accuracy in scenarios with motion blur.
  • Achieved higher accuracy compared to the VINS-Mono framework, outperforming it by an average of 18.18%.
  • Showcased substantial optimization rates for Root Mean Square (RMS) error in field tests (65.66% for F1, 41.74% for F2).

Conclusions:

  • The adaptive covariance matrix estimation method enhances the accuracy and robustness of UAV-based VINS.
  • The approach effectively mitigates the negative impact of motion blur and fluctuating image clarity.
  • Validated through extensive simulations and field tests, proving its practical applicability.