Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Evidence that cultural groups differ in their abilities to detect fake accents: a follow up
Jonathan R Goodman1,2, Robert A Foley3
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract:
We recently reported that cultural group membership may be a predictor of the likelihood that an individual will detect a faked accent in a recording. Here, we present follow-up data to our original study using a larger data set comprised of responses from the across the world. Our findings are in line with our previous work and suggest that native listeners perform better at this task than do non-native listeners overall, although with some between-group variation. We discuss our findings within the context of signals of trustworthiness and suggest future avenues of research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Confirmation Biases
Nonconscious Mimicry
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Social Proof
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...

