Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
Practical Guidance for Using PurpleAir Particle Monitors for Indoor and Outdoor Measurements in Community Field
Mingyu Wang1, David Chang2, Aditya Singh1
1Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Alumni Memorial Hall Room 228, 3201 S Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60616 USA.
Abstract:
Low-cost particle monitors have been widely evaluated in laboratory and ambient monitoring settings, but we have less knowledge about their performance for long-term indoor and outdoor monitoring in residential settings. We seek to provide practical guidance for using a type of low-cost particle monitors that have become widespread for indoor and outdoor monitoring in community field studies, PurpleAir PA-II monitors. We base our insights on experiences in a community-led residential field study in and around homes of predominantly agricultural workers in California's San Joaquin Valley. Our guidance spans three categories: (1) providing tools for handling and merging disparate data structures resulting from Wi-Fi-transmitted data and data collected on onboard microSD cards, (2) assessing performance metrics of PA-II monitors from laboratory co-location and field measurements, and (3) assessing data collection success rates of Wi-Fi data transmission and microSD card data acquisition from our study locations. The post-processing methods we demonstrate can successfully align data from both Wi-Fi transmission and microSD cards. Laboratory co-location measurements demonstrated that > 90% of the tested monitors performed well relative to each other (high precision), with only a few problematic monitors that warranted further investigation or exclusion from use. The application of co-location factors generated using the mean of all co-located monitors as a reference did not significantly affect distributions of field-measured indoor or outdoor PM2.5 concentrations. Relying solely on Wi-Fi data transmission in our study would have resulted in large data loss (i.e., < 50% success rate); using microSD card storage with PA-II-SD monitors increased the data collection success rate to over 80% in these settings. This work contributes to the growing body of knowledge on low-cost particle sensor performance and usability.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44408-025-00048-4.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Measurement of Air Content in Concrete
The pressure method,...

