Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
Endoscopic Image-Based Prediction of Esophageal Stenosis after ESD Using Mucosal Defect Metrics
Wei Lin1,2, Yi-Zhi Liang3, Dun-Huang Peng3
1Department of Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Background:
Stricture is a major adverse event following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Although postoperative esophageal stenosis after ESD is clearly associated with large mucosal defects, there are no quantitative criteria for the degree of the defect. We aimed to examine the predictive factors associated with the development of esophageal stenosis after ESD, and to explore quantitative indicators for predicting postoperative stenosis.
Patients And Methods:
A retrospective analysis of endoscopic data from patients with esophageal ESD was conducted. The area and perimeter of the resected mucosa defect were measured by Image Pro Plus 6.0. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and nomogram model were adopted for analysis.
Results:
The median area of resected mucosal defect was 527.74 mm2 (IQR 322.80-823.48), the median perimeter was 91.75 mm (IQR 71.69-118.32), and the median circumferential ratio was 33% (IQR 20-40). Owing to collinearity between the perimeter and area of the resected mucosal defect, these variables were analyzed individually in the multivariate analysis (r = 0.958, P < 0.001). All three factors mentioned above were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative esophageal stenosis (P < 0.05), while intraoperative muscularis propria injury was not (P > 0.05). On the basis of the above results, prediction models were constructed and validated internally. The concordance statistics (C-statistics) of the training and validation sets including perimeter or area were 0.875 and 0.830 and 0.747 and 0.835, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test results were not significant (P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
Accurate quantification of the area and perimeter of resected mucosa by image analysis technology can accurately predict esophageal stenosis after ESD.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...

