Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
Published on: March 26, 2015
Prevalence and Success of Pediatric Orthopaedic Trainee Research Grants
Andy M Liu1, Mackenzie Bird, Adeesya Gausper
1Cedars-Sinai Department of Orthopaedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Background:
In this study, we evaluate the frequency of trainee grants awarded to pediatric orthopaedic topics, their subsequent publication success, and the recipients' career trajectories post-training.
Methods:
Research grants awarded by SRS (2020-2024), OREF (2012-2022), AONA (2000-2021), OTA (2012-2022), and POSNA (2014-2024) were obtained from their respective organizations. Only projects awarded to trainees (residents/fellows) and specific to pediatric orthopaedic topics were included. Projects were characterized by study type: (1) basic science, (2) biomechanical, (3) clinical, and (4) other. Univariable analysis was performed to determine the impact of the category of grant and grant amount on subsequent publication. Recipients were also evaluated on post-residency career trajectories, including academic position and specialization in pediatrics orthopaedics.
Results:
A total of 1015 grants were analyzed, with a total of 55 (5%) that were awarded to trainees. Of these grants, 13% were basic science, 20% were biomechanical, 45% were clinical-based, and 22% were other types. At the time of data collection, 58% (n=32) were published. Project type was not associated with publication success. Of the 35 recipients who finished training at the time of analysis, 80% (n=28) of recipients held an academic position and 63% (n=22) had completed a pediatric orthopaedic fellowship.
Conclusions:
Pediatric-specific trainee grants are associated with high publication rates. The majority of grant recipients pursue pediatric orthopaedic fellowships and continue in academic medicine. Compared with trauma resident research grants, pediatric grants are less available (397 vs. 55); however, recipients of pediatric grants are more likely to publish their grant (58% vs. 38%) and obtain academic positions following training (80% vs. 45%).
Level Of Evidence:
Level III.

