Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Protein language model pseudolikelihoods capture features of in vivo B cell selection and evolution
Daphne van Ginneken1, Anamay Samant2, Karlis Daga-Krumins1
1Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht 3584EA, The Netherlands.
Protein language models (PLMs) can predict B cell selection features in vivo, including somatic hypermutation and isotype usage. These models offer potential for antibody discovery and engineering by analyzing antibody sequence data.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- B cell selection and evolution are critical for effective immune responses.
- Advances in sequencing and deep learning provide vast antibody repertoire data.
- Protein language models (PLMs) learn complex antibody sequence representations for various applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if PLMs can capture and predict in vivo B cell selection features.
- To analyze the relationship between PLM-generated sequence pseudolikelihoods (SPs) and B cell selection markers.
- To explore the utility of PLMs in understanding antibody evolution and engineering.
Main Methods:
- Utilized general and antibody-specific PLMs to generate sequence pseudolikelihoods (SPs).
- Correlated SPs with in vivo B cell selection features: expansion, isotype usage, and somatic hypermutation (SHM) at single-cell resolution.
- Constructed evolutionary lineage trees from human and mouse B cell repertoires.
Main Results:
- PLM type and antibody sequence region significantly influenced SPs.
- Observed a negative correlation between SPs and binding affinity, contrasting in vitro findings.
- Found strong correlations between SPs and repertoire features like SHM and isotype usage.
- Identified SHMs as likely mutations suggested by PLMs, with conserved residues having higher likelihoods.
Conclusions:
- PLMs can predict key features of in vivo B cell selection, including SHM and isotype usage.
- SPs correlate with specific B cell evolutionary patterns, differing from binding affinity predictions.
- PLMs show promise for assisting in antibody discovery and engineering by modeling B cell evolution.
More Related Videos
09:25Detection and Enrichment of Rare Antigen-specific B Cells for Analysis of Phenotype and Function
Published on: February 16, 2017
15:07VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma
Published on: December 28, 2015
Related Concept Videos
B Cell Activation and Differentiation
When naive B cells encounter a specific antigen that can bind to the B cell receptor (BCR) on their surface, they undergo sensitization to respond to the antigen's presence. Sensitization begins with...
T Cell Activation and Clonal Selection
Naive T cells that have not yet encountered an antigen express two primary CD...
Diversity of Antigen Receptors
Before encountering any antigen, lymphocytes express these receptors. On B cells, the antigen receptor is a membrane-bound antibody molecule called BCR; on T cells, it is a T cell receptor or TCR. B and T cell receptors are composed of two...
Leaky Scanning
Special Features of Adaptive Immunity
The primary cell types involved in adaptive immunity are T cells and B cells. Each type has a unique role in defending the body against pathogens. T cells are responsible for cell-mediated immunity. They identify and eliminate infected cells directly,...