Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025
Burn Injury-Induced Pain and Depression-Like Behavior in Mice
Published on: September 29, 2021
Antimuscarinics for burn patients: Helpful or harmful for sensation recovery?
Zachary H Zamore1, Jeffrey Khong1, Rachana Suresh1
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Background:
Burn injuries are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, often resulting in nerve damage that causes pain or numbness. Loss of protective sensation increases the risk of future injury. Enhancing nerve regeneration after burns is critical. Antimuscarinic drugs, used to treat overactive bladder, have shown potential in promoting peripheral nerve growth by supporting cytoskeletal development and mitochondrial trafficking. This study investigates whether antimuscarinic use at the time of burn injury is associated with increased nerve regeneration.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX Research Database. Burn patients were identified using ICD-10-CM codes by anatomical area and total burn surface area (TBSA). The experimental group included patients taking one of seven antimuscarinic drugs (darifenacin, fesoterodine, oxybutynin, propiverine, solifenacin, tolterodine, or trospium) at the time of injury. Controls were burn patients not on these medications. Patients with preexisting sensory disturbances were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed by age, sex, diabetes status, and either burn location or TBSA. Paresthesia 3-24 months post-injury was used as a proxy for nerve regeneration.
Results:
Among 362,224 patients with burns coded by anatomical area, 9266 antimuscarinic users were matched to 9266 controls. Users were over twice as likely to develop paresthesia (RR: 2.19, CI: [1.85, 2.60]) and had higher analgesic use (52.4 % vs. 30.3 %, p < 0.001). For 168,164 patients with burns coded by TBSA, 3294 matched pairs showed similar findings: increased paresthesia (RR: 2.95, CI: [2.06, 4.23]) and analgesic use (50.1 % vs. 25.3 %, p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Burn patients on antimuscarinic therapy were more likely to develop paresthesia, possibly indicating nerve regeneration. While this may reflect sensory recovery, it could also lead to abnormal or painful sensations that negatively impact quality of life. Further research is needed to assess functional outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Cholinergic Antagonists: Therapeutic Uses
Respiratory Tract: Ipratropium, aclidinium, and tiotropium treat asthma, chronic bronchitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). They protect against bronchoconstriction caused by irritants like cigarette smoke, sulfur dioxide, and ozone. They also help reduce nasopharyngeal...
01:28Cholinergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions
Gastrointestinal Effects: Antimuscarinics reduce gut contractions, increase gastric emptying, and slow intestinal transit. They partly inhibit gastric acid secretion...
01:24Cholinergic Antagonists: Pharmacokinetics
01:20Antiasthma Drugs: Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists
Antimuscarinic agents compete with ACh for the same binding site on the muscarinic receptors. By binding to these receptors, they inhibit the downstream effects of ACh and block the parasympathetic...
01:22Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
01:30Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Pharmacological Actions
At the neuromuscular junction, these agents work by inhibiting the breakdown of acetylcholine, allowing it to remain bound to the receptor and bind to nearby receptors. This process leads to repetitive firing of the endplate, causing muscle...