Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approaches to Study Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Colonization of Milky Spot Structures in Peritoneal Adipose
Published on: October 14, 2015
Standardization, Education, and Resourcing: The Way Forward for Implementing Polygenic Risk Scores in Hereditary
Rebecca Purvis1,2, Natalie Taylor3, Mary-Anne Young4,5
1Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract:
The clinical utility and implementation of polygenic risk scores (PRS) in the setting of personalized risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) continues to be investigated. We aimed to explore and analyze genetic healthcare providers' perspectives toward national implementation in Australia, acknowledging the vitality of provider knowledge, priorities, and support. A two-phase exploratory, cross-sectional, mixed-method study was conducted, consisting of semistructured interviews and a national online survey. Participants were recruited through professional networks. Interview schedule, survey design, and analyses were informed by the Consolidated Framework from Implementation Research (CFIR), the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of facilitative strategies. Surveys were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Twenty-seven participants were interviewed and forty completed the survey. Participants were supportive of clinical implementation of PRS, with implementation enablers in sector culture, compatibility with practice and professional role, and providers' knowledge and skills. Concerns were raised on insufficient resourcing, equity and timeliness of delivery, and the safety and effectiveness of ovarian cancer PRS. Training and educating stakeholders and achieving standardization, including establishing an accredited test, national guidelines, care and funding models, and results reports, were implementation priorities. Findings will support the design of a provider-informed model or framework to plan and prioritize the next steps toward national implementation. Resourcing will be a key challenge. Current enablers in the sector, evidence-based implementation strategies, and direction of efforts toward these priorities of education and standardization will enhance implementation readiness and efficiency.
More Related Videos
08:15gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair
Published on: October 6, 2014
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Polygenic Traits
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Heritability