Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Comparison of Number and Overlap of Diagnostic Information for Risk Adjustment for Dually Enrolled Veterans in
Patrick N O'Mahen1,2, Chase S Eck1,2, Suja S Rajan1,3
1Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Veterans Health Administration, Houston, Texas, USA.
Objective:
To measure discrepancies in risk adjustment scores using only Medicaid or Veterans Health Administration (VA) diagnoses for Veterans dually enrolled in VA and Medicaid.
Study Setting And Design:
Veterans aged 18-64 enrolled in the VA and Medicaid for at least one full calendar year during 2017-2020. We compared the number and overlap of annual diagnoses derived from VA and Medicaid data. We also calculated Charlson, Elixhauser, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Hierarchical Condition Categories Version 21 (CMS-V21) risk scores using VA-only, Medicaid-only, and combined VA-Medicaid data for each person-year. We used intraclass correlations within risk measures to compare scores across risk measures.
Data Sources And Analytic Sample:
We used data from the VA's Assistant Deputy Undersecretary for Health's (ADUSH) enrollment files regarding age and VA Priority Group to select our cohort of VA enrollees. We used T-MSIS Analytic Files (TAF) and the Demographics and Enrollment (DE) file to determine Medicaid enrollment.
Principal Findings:
Our study cohort contained 183,018 dual-enrollees with service-connected disabilities representing 405,318 person years and 219,977 dual enrollees without service-connected disabilities (531,948 person years). On average, service-connected individuals had 9.1 fewer diagnoses from Medicaid-only data than from VA-only data (95% Confidence Interval (CI): [9.0, 9.1]) and 5.0 fewer for non-service-connected Veterans (95% CI: [4.9, 5.1]). Intraclass correlations between VA-only data and combined VA-Medicaid scores had higher correlations for Charlson (0.816 vs. 0.591 for service connected, 0.722 vs. 0.638 for non-service connected) and Elixhauser (0.818 vs. 0.609 for service-connected, 0.723 to 0.702 non-service-connected) scores, while Medicaid-only scores had higher correlations for CMS V21 (0.756 vs. 0.666 for service-connected, 0.795 to 0.542 for non service-connected).
Conclusions:
Medicaid and VA data represent non-overlapping diagnoses data in three common risk scores. Researchers should consider combining records to calculate disease burden for dual-enrolled Veterans to ensure complete capture of risk.
Related Concept Videos
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Relative Risk
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

