Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Introduction01:13

Gas Chromatography: Introduction

2.3K
Gas chromatography (GC) is a technique for separating and analyzing volatile compounds in a sample. Its primary purpose is to identify and quantify components in complex mixtures, making it essential in fields such as environmental analysis, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals. GC is also called vapor-phase chromatography (VPC) or gas-liquid partition chromatography (GLPC).
In GC,  a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
2.3K
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

4.6K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
4.6K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

498
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
498
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

785
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
785
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis01:21

Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis

889
Mass spectrometry is an important technique for the identification of pure compounds. However, it has some limitations for the analysis of complex mixtures, often due to excessive fragmentation making the spectrum too complicated to decipher. Mass spectrometry can be combined with suitable separation methods in sequence, forming hyphenated methods, which are useful in the analysis of complex mixtures.
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
889
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

605
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
605

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differential Modulation of GLP-1R by Dietary Ginsenosides Points to a Putative Extracellular Allosteric Site.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Distinct Tear Element Signatures in Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Identified by Particle-Induced X-Ray Emission.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Elevated iron levels in tears of patients diagnosed with WDR45 X-linked optic atrophy.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2026
Same author

Barriers to the Pharmacologic Rescue of W1282X CFTR.

Biochemistry·2025
Same author

Sirt6 prevents the age-related decline of H<sub>2</sub>S through the control of one-carbon metabolism.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Elemental Composition Analysis of Sheep Tears Using Particle-Induced X-Ray Emission.

Veterinary ophthalmology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.1K

Machine Learning-Based Identification of Petroleum Distillates and Gasoline Traces Using Measured and Synthetic GC

Omer Kaspi1,2, Yaniv Y Avissar3, Arnon Grafit3

  • 1School of Electrical Engineering - System Engineering Program, Afeka College of Engineering, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Molecular Informatics
|August 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic experts can now use a new Machine Learning (ML) workflow to classify ignitable liquids from fire scenes using gas chromatography (GC) spectra. This method, enhanced by synthetic data generation, improves classification accuracy and efficiency in arson investigations.

Keywords:
classificationdata synthesisdeep learningforensic informaticsgasolineignitable liquidsmachine learningpetroleum distillates

More Related Videos

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool
05:31

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool

Published on: May 25, 2021

7.3K
On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.1K
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool
05:31

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool

Published on: May 25, 2021

7.3K
On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • Arson investigations rely on forensic experts analyzing gas chromatography (GC) spectra to detect ignitable liquids.
  • Current methods are time-consuming, especially when ignitable liquids are absent.
  • Machine Learning (ML) offers a potential solution to automate and improve the accuracy of spectral analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an ML-based workflow for classifying ignitable liquids using GC chromatograms (spectra).
  • To create a novel spectra synthesis algorithm to augment limited experimental data.
  • To evaluate the impact of dataset size and ML algorithms on classification performance.

Main Methods:

  • Collected and annotated 181 real spectra from fire scenes and reference databases.
  • Developed ML models using k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), representative spectrum, and Random Forest (RF) algorithms.
  • Created a spectra synthesis algorithm to generate a large dataset of synthetic spectra.
  • Trained and tested kNN, RF, representative spectrum, and Deep Learning (DL) models on both real and synthetic datasets.

Main Results:

  • ML models achieved high F1-scores (0.74-0.96) on real spectra when trained on augmented datasets.
  • Performance was more dependent on the size of the training dataset than the specific ML algorithm used.
  • Models trained on larger, synthesized datasets showed improved predictive power on independent real spectra.

Conclusions:

  • The developed ML workflow and spectra synthesis algorithm effectively classify ignitable liquids from GC spectra.
  • Increased dataset size significantly enhances ML model performance in forensic spectral analysis.
  • The methodology is adaptable to other forensic domains utilizing spectral data.