Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reliability of verbal-manual interference.

D G Clark, B Guitar, P R Hoffman

    Brain and Cognition
    |October 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Projected decrease in trail access in the Arctic.

    Communications earth & environment·2024
    Same author

    Proceedings of the Rock River Medical Society.

    Illinois and Indiana medical and surgical journal·2023
    Same author

    Differential Impact of Index Stroke on Dementia Risk in African-Americans Compared to Whites.

    Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2018
    Same author

    The role of environmental factors in search and rescue incidents in Nunavut, Canada.

    Public health·2016
    Same author

    Latent information in fluency lists predicts functional decline in persons at risk for Alzheimer disease.

    Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2014
    Same author

    Lexical factors and cerebral regions influencing verbal fluency performance in MCI.

    Neuropsychologia·2014
    Same journal

    Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    See all related articles

    This study found that unimanual finger tapping is a reliable method for assessing language lateralization in adults. The research also determined there are no significant sex differences in hemispheric specialization for language using this tapping task.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Psycholinguistics

    Background:

    • Unimanual finger tapping with concurrent vocalization is frequently used to evaluate language lateralization in the brain hemispheres.
    • Assessing the reliability and potential sex differences of this method is crucial for accurate research.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine the reliability of an index finger tapping task as a measure of hemispheric lateralization for language in adults.
    • To investigate if sex differences exist in hemispheric specialization for language as indicated by the finger tapping task.

    Main Methods:

    • Thirty right-handed adults (15 male, 15 female, aged 18-25) participated.
    • The study measured differences in tapping rate for each hand with and without a concurrent verbal task.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Task reliability was assessed over 3 consecutive days.

    • Main Results:

    • The index finger tapping task demonstrated reliability as a measure.
    • No statistically significant differences were observed in tapping scores between male and female participants.

    Conclusions:

    • The unimanual index finger tapping task is a reliable tool for assessing language lateralization in adults.
    • This method does not reveal sex differences in hemispheric specialization for language.