Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Three and Four-Dimensional Visualization and Analysis Approaches to Study Vertebrate Axial Elongation and Segmentation
Published on: February 28, 2021
Prevalence of spinal deformities in myelomeningoceles treated in utero and postnatally, utilizing 3D external
Vinicius de Meldau Benites1,2, Vinicius Santos Baptista3, Matheus Galvão Valadares Bertolini Mussalem4
1Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Ibaiti, 145, São Paulo, SP, 03414-150, Brazil. drviniciusbenites@gmail.com.
Insights
In utero myelomeningocele (MMC) repair shows improved outcomes, with lower rates of scoliosis and urinary incontinence compared to postnatal surgery. This suggests a better overall prognosis for patients undergoing fetal MMC treatment.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Fetal Medicine
- Neurosurgery
Background:
- Myelomeningocele (MMC) is a severe birth defect impacting the spinal cord.
- Surgical repair is crucial, with options for in utero or postnatal intervention.
- Spinal deformities and associated complications are significant concerns post-MMC repair.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the prevalence of spinal deformities in patients who underwent in utero myelomeningocele (MMC) repair versus those who had postnatal surgery.
- To evaluate differences in shunt requirement, incontinence, and other complications between the two surgical timing groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective selection of 70 patients (2006-2021) treated for MMC.
- Prospective external orthopedic system (EOS) imaging for patients under 18.
- Radiographic analysis of scoliosis, pelvic parameters, and sagittal balance; comparison of birth metrics, shunt needs, and incontinence rates.
Main Results:
- The in utero MMC repair group (47 patients) showed significantly lower rates of ventriculoperitoneal shunt requirement (p=0.001), scoliosis incidence (p=0.020), and urinary incontinence (p=0.009).
- While Cobb angle did not differ significantly, the in utero group had lower axial pelvic rotation (p=0.024).
- Patients undergoing in utero repair had lower birth weight and gestational age but similar age and gender distributions compared to the postnatal group.
Conclusions:
- In utero MMC repair is associated with a reduced incidence of acquired scoliosis and lower rates of urinary incontinence.
- Fetal surgical intervention for MMC appears to lead to a better overall prognosis, including decreased need for shunting.
- These findings support the benefits of considering in utero repair for myelomeningocele.
Purpose:
This study analyzes the prevalence of spinal deformities in patients who underwent in utero myelomeningocele (MMC) repair compared to those who had postnatal surgery.
Methods:
Patients treated at Hospital São Paulo and Hospital e Maternidade Santa Joana between 2006 and 2021 were included. Selection was retrospective; external orthopedic system (EOS) imaging was performed prospectively. Only patients under 18 at the time of imaging were analyzed. Data collected included birth metrics, need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt, urinary/fecal incontinence, and postnatal complications. Radiographic analysis assessed scoliosis, pelvic parameters, and sagittal balance. Groups were compared using statistical tests (p < 0.05).
Results:
Seventy patients were evaluated: 47 had in utero repair and 23 postnatal. Groups were similar in age (p = 0.089) and gender (p = 0.725), but the in utero group had lower birth weight (p = 0.024) and gestational age (p = 0.004). Ventriculoperitoneal shunt requirement (p = 0.001), scoliosis incidence (p = 0.020), and urinary incontinence (p = 0.009) were significantly lower in the in utero group. Cobb angle did not differ significantly. Most postnatal complications were comparable, except for lower axial pelvic rotation in the in utero group (p = 0.024).
Conclusion:
In utero MMC repair is associated with reduced rates of acquired scoliosis, need for shunting, and urinary incontinence, indicating a better overall prognosis compared to postnatal surgery.
More Related Videos
06:26Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Potential of TUBE Technique in Spinal Surgery
Published on: November 17, 2023
04:33Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
Published on: November 8, 2024