Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 16, 2018
Cortico-Cancellous Collagenic Porcine Bone for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Cohort Comparative Study.
Chiara Cinquini1,2, Emira D'amico3, Giovanna Iezzi3
1Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and of Critical Area Pathology, Complex Operative Unit of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, University-Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
This study compared two cortico-cancellous porcine bone formulations for alveolar ridge preservation. Both effectively supported dental implants, showing favorable clinical and aesthetic outcomes with minimal bone loss.
Area of Science:
- Dental regenerative medicine
- Periodontology
- Biomaterials science
Background:
- Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is crucial for successful dental implant placement.
- Cortico-cancellous porcine bone (CCPB) is a promising biomaterial for ARP.
- Evaluating different CCPB formulations is essential for optimizing clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare histomorphometric characteristics of two CCPB formulations used in ARP.
- To evaluate and compare clinical and aesthetic outcomes of dental implants placed in augmented sites.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, cohort-comparative study involving 20 patients requiring tooth extraction, ARP, and implant placement.
- Two CCPB formulations with a thermogel were used: 50:50 hand-mixed and 80:20 pre-mixed.
- Histomorphometric analysis of bone biopsies, implant placement after 4 months, and prosthetic loading after 3 months, with 1-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- The hand-mixed 50:50 CCPB group showed a trend towards higher newly formed bone (36.15%) compared to the pre-mixed 80:20 group (27.18%), though not statistically significant (p=0.064).
- Both groups exhibited minimal marginal bone loss at 1 year (0.06 ± 0.15 mm vs. 0.25 ± 0.35 mm, p=0.42).
- No statistically significant differences were found in aesthetic outcomes between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Both CCPB formulations demonstrated effective and favorable outcomes for alveolar ridge preservation and subsequent dental implant placement.
- Observed histomorphometric differences did not significantly impact final clinical or aesthetic results.
- The choice between hand-mixed and pre-mixed CCPB formulations may not critically affect long-term implant success and aesthetics.
More Related Videos
08:41Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
09:49Author Spotlight: Insights into the Use of Apple-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
Published on: February 23, 2024