Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

04:50
Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
334
Long-Term Routine Laboratory Toxicity Monitoring of Immunomodulatory Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis : A Retrospective
Evy Ulijn1, Nathan den Broeder1, Karen Bevers1
1Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (E.U., N.d.B., K.B.).
Annals of Internal Medicine
|August 25, 2025
Summary
Routine laboratory monitoring for rheumatoid arthritis patients on DMARDs shows many abnormal results are anticipated or unrelated to drug toxicity. Reconsidering long-term monitoring strategies is advised.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Limited data exists on the value of long-term routine laboratory toxicity monitoring (lt-RLTM) during disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use.
- This scarcity leads to frequent monitoring in clinical practice, potentially without clear benefit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the cumulative incidence of abnormal and very abnormal laboratory monitoring results in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
- To characterize the clinical context surrounding new very abnormal laboratory results during DMARD therapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study conducted in the Netherlands from July 2008 to April 2020.
- Analysis of lt-RLTM data from 4774 RA patients on DMARDs for at least 6 months.
- Calculation of cumulative probabilities for abnormal/very abnormal results in liver function, kidney function (eGFR), hemoglobin, leukocyte, and platelet counts; chart review for clinical context of new very abnormal results.
Main Results:
- Cumulative probabilities of very abnormal results at 5 years ranged from 0.3% (leukocyte count) to 11% (eGFR).
- New very abnormal results (n=449) were often anticipated, unrelated to DMARDs, or did not prompt action.
- High cumulative incidence of less serious abnormal results observed, e.g., 39% for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² and 61% for Hb <7.5/8 mmol/L.
Conclusions:
- Most very abnormal laboratory results during long-term monitoring were clinically anticipated or occurred post-dose escalation.
- The cumulative incidence of less serious abnormal results was notably high.
- Current strategies for lt-RLTM warrant reconsideration due to findings on the clinical utility of frequent monitoring.

