Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Measuring Psoriasis Severity at Home
Published on: March 1, 2024
Measurement properties of instruments assessing peripheral arthritis disease activity in spondyloarthritis: a
Dafne Capelusnik1,2, Clementina López-Medina3, Casper Weber1,4
1Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Objectives:
The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society-Spondyloarthritis and Peripheral Arthritis Disease Activity Instrument Selection and Evaluation (ASAS-SPARADISE) project aims to identify instruments to assess disease activity due to peripheral arthritis in axial (axSpA) and peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA). We aimed to summarise and compare the measurement properties of instruments used for this purpose as part of the ASAS-SPARADISE.
Methods:
A systematic literature review (Medline/EMBASE/Cochrane; until February 2025) was conducted following the Population-Instrument-Measurement framework. Eligible studies included adults with axSpA or pSpA and peripheral arthritis. Instruments retained from a previous review, after domain-match and feasibility assessment, included: Patient Global Assessment (PGA), swollen joint count (66/44), tender joint count (68/44), C reactive protein (CRP), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Disease Activity Score using 44 joints. Measurement properties evaluated were construct validity (correlation hypotheses; known-groups discrimination) and discrimination (test-retest reliability, responsiveness; clinical trial discrimination; thresholds of meaning). Risk of bias was assessed using the Outcome Measures on Rheumatology (OMERACT) Good Methods Checklist and evidence was synthesised following OMERACT rules (GREEN-good; AMBER-adequate; RED-poor performance).
Results:
Of 4,364 records screened, eight studies were eligible. Evidence in axSpA was limited to PGA, CRP and BASDAI, rating mostly AMBER for construct validity, longitudinal construct validity and discrimination in clinical trials. In pSpA, composite instruments showed better results, with BASDAI, ASDAS and DAPSA rating mostly GREEN. No study provided test-retest reliability or thresholds of meaning.
Conclusions:
Evidence supporting instruments to assess peripheral arthritis in spondyloarthritis remains scarce, especially in axSpA. Composite instruments in pSpA performed better, but evidence gaps persist, highlighting the need for validated, domain-specific instruments.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD420251177596.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies