Oral reference dose (RfD) derivation for five bisphenol A alternatives integrating BMD and NOAEL/LOAEL approaches
Yan Xia1, Wenhua Ma2, Jing Cao3
1Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Contaminants Exposure and Health, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Health Risk Control, Institute of Environmental Health and Pollution Control, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Ecological Security and Green Development, Key Laboratory of City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Contaminants Exposure and Health, Center for Disease Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510430, PR China.
None:
Bisphenols (BPs) are widely used in plastic manufacturing, food packaging, and other industrial applications, with bisphenol A (BPA) being one of the most extensively produced chemicals globally. However, due to its endocrine-disrupting properties, BPA has been linked to reproductive abnormalities, metabolic disorders, neurodevelopmental impairments, and other adverse health effects, leading to regulatory restrictions. These restrictions have resulted in increased usage of BPA alternatives and thus exposure to the alternatives, whose toxicity thresholds remain insufficiently characterized. To address this gap, this study derived reference doses (RfDs) for five BPA alternatives, i.e., bisphenol B (BPB), bisphenol P (BPP), bisphenol Z (BPZ), bisphenol AF (BPAF), and bisphenol AP (BPAP), by integrating epidemiological data and animal experiments. The RfDs were calculated using Benchmark Dose (BMD) modeling and no observed adverse effect level/lowest observed adverse effect level (NOAEL/LOAEL) approaches, combined with uncertainty analysis to quantify risk metrics. The results demonstrated that the BMD-derived RfDs for BPB, BPP, and BPZ were 1.05, 0.23, and 5.13 μg/kg-bw/day, respectively, while the NOAEL/LOAEL-based RfDs for BPAF and BPAP were 0.04 and 2.31 ng/kg-bw/day. By refining toxicity thresholds and risk assessment methodologies, this study not only highlights the potential health risks posed by BPs but also supports evidence-based policymaking to safeguard public health.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Toxicity Testing in Animals


