Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
Published on: November 3, 2010
Properties of Runs of Homozygosity as a Measure of Identity by Descent
Oda B Wæge1, Tom Druet2, Peer Berg1
1Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Abstract:
Runs of Homozygosity (ROH) are commonly used to quantify autozygosity/identity-by-descent (IBD) in an individual or population. However, the method's accuracy at the segment level in livestock populations has only been evaluated in a few studies. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine to what extent ROH are truly IBD and estimate the proportion of IBD segments that go undetected in a simulated livestock population. We simulated a population of randomly mating animals for 100 generations. The genome consisted of a single chromosome with a SNP density of either 46 or 92 SNPs per mega base (Mb). In addition, a set of founder markers tracing IBD was recorded. ROH were detected using four different parameter combinations. Using the two sets of markers, we calculated the true positive rate, power, and overall correlation between true (FIBD) and estimated inbreeding (FROH). Additionally, a new measure for within-ROH inbreeding (F|ROH) was introduced and calculated the level of homozygosity within a ROH compared to the general expectation in the genome. The results indicate that ROH longer than 2 Mb are a reliable indicator of IBD, with the F|ROH being over 0.9 for all ROH lengths and parameter combinations. True positive rates only exceeded 0.9 consistently for ROH over 9 Mb, indicating that many of the identified ROH may be associated with common ancestors more ancient than the base population. The power was mainly controlled by the parameter stringency, that is, allowing for shorter ROH increased the power. The ROH-based individual measure of inbreeding FROH was highly correlated to FIBD while also having regression coefficients close to 1 (i.e., a 1% variation in FROH corresponded to a 1% variation in FIBD). Using stringent ROH parameters resulted in underestimation of the rate of inbreeding in the population. Increasing marker density improved predictions, including a higher true positive rate, power, higher correlations, and less underestimation of inbreeding rates.
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles,...
Pedigree Analysis
Heritability
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The test works...
Law of Segregation

