Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Delayed diagnosis of aortic dissection: the overlooked clues on chest X-ray
Yao Chen1, Wenjin Wang2, Lian Lin3
1Gynecology Department, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, 1 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730099, Gansu, China.
Background:
Acute aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening vascular emergency requiring immediate intervention, with mortality rates increasing by 1-2% per hour post-onset. The pathophysiology involves an intimal tear that permits blood to enter the medial layer, forming a false lumen that may expand and compromise branch vessels and end-organ perfusion. Current guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and American Heart Association (AHA) highlight the necessity of risk stratification based on clinical features (e.g., tearing pain, pulse deficits), predisposing factors (e.g., hypertension), and D-dimer levels, followed by confirmatory imaging with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or computed tomography angiography (CTA). Despite advancements in imaging, chest radiography (CXR) remains underutilized; however, key findings-such as mediastinal widening (≥ 5 cm at the aortic knob), abnormal aortic contour, and displaced intimal calcifications-can offer critical diagnostic information.
Case Report:
A young male patient presented with acute chest pain following strenuous exertion. Initial outpatient evaluation, including complete blood count (CBC), liver function tests (LFTs), renal function tests (RFTs), cardiac enzymes, and chest X-ray (CXR), yielded nondiagnostic results, leading to his discharge with analgesics. Three days later, during a national holiday when outpatient clinics were closed, the patient returned to the emergency department (ED) with persistent chest pain. A meticulous review of the initial CXR by the emergency physician revealed mediastinal widening (measuring 8.5 cm) and an abnormal contour of the aorta. Subsequent emergency computed tomography angiography (CTA) confirmed the diagnosis of a Stanford type B aortic dissection.
Conclusions:
This case underscores two critical learning points: (1) the diagnostic pitfalls associated with atypical early presentations of aortic dissection, and (2) the often underappreciated value of meticulous interpretation of chest X-rays in the evaluation of acute chest pain, particularly when initial studies yield unremarkable results. The three-day diagnostic delay emphasizes the necessity of maintaining a high index of suspicion for aortic dissection, even in young patients lacking classic risk factors.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

