Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Providing Meaningful Environmental Enrichment and Measuring Saliva Cortisol in Pigs Housed on Slatted Flooring
Published on: September 30, 2019
Predicting the Net Energy Partition Patterns of Growing Pigs Based on Different Nutrients
Wenjun Gao1, Zhengcheng Zeng1, Huangwei Shi1
1State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
None:
This study aimed to determine the net energy (NE) values of common energy-supplying nutrients, including starch, protein, and fat, to investigate their influence on energetic efficiency and NE partition patterns in growing pigs, and to develop prediction equations for the protein deposition (PD) and lipid deposition (LD) based on nutrient characteristics of ingredients. Two experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, 36 growing barrows (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire, initial body weight = 28.1 ± 0.8 kg) were randomly allotted to six treatments, with six replicated pigs per treatment. The diets were formulated as follows: a corn-soybean meal basal diet (T1), and five experimental diets containing of 27% corn starch (T2), 27% tapioca starch (T3), 27% pea starch (T4), 5% soybean oil (T5), and 11.8% casein (T6), respectively. In Experiment 2, PD and LD data of 47 ingredients were collected. Subsequently, the nutrient characteristics of ingredients were used as input variables, and PD and LD were used as output variables to establish the prediction equations. Results exhibited that pigs fed the T2, T3, and T4 diets showed increased digestibility of gross energy (GE) and organic matter (OM) compared to those fed the T1 diet (p < 0.01). For various kind of starches, a greater efficiency of using metabolizable energy (ME) for net energy not deposited as protein (PD-free NE, efficiency denoted as kj) was observed when pigs were fed the T2 or T3 diets compared to the T4 diet. Moreover, the kj of soybean oil was 11% and 27% greater than that of starch and casein, respectively, while casein demonstrated 46% and 39% greater efficiency of using ME for PD (efficiency denoted as pj) compared to starch and soybean oil, respectively. Finally, the best-fitted prediction equations for PD and LD were PD = 364.36 - 18.44 × GE + 29.10 × CP - 3.79 × EE - 21.37 × ADF (R2 = 0.96; RMSE = 105.15) and LD = -1503.50 + 21.58 × CP + 51.98 × EE + 26.30 × Starch + 26.81 × NDF - 23.87 × ADF (R2 = 0.98; RMSE = 172.85), respectively. In summary, there are considerable differences in energetic efficiency and NE partition patterns among various nutrients. In addition, PD and LD can be predicted through nutrient characteristics of ingredients, presenting an innovative approach and methodological framework for the precision nutrition of pigs.
Related Concept Videos
Production Efficiency
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Energy Budgets
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns

