Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
Influence of Polishing and Glazing on Surface Characteristics and Biofilm Formation on Zirconia: An In Vitro Study
Gabriela de Arruda Ribeiro1, Viviane de Cássia Oliveira1, Adriana Cláudia Lápria Faria1
1Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Café Avenue S/N, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, SP, Brazil.
Abstract:
Background: Monolithic zirconia has attracted considerable interest in dentistry due to its favorable physical and mechanical properties, making it a promising alternative for crown fabrication. Nonetheless, a standardized finishing protocol for this material has yet to be established. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation of zirconia finished by either polishing or glazing. Methods: A total of 72 zirconia specimens were fabricated and divided into control, glazing, and polishing groups. Surface analysis included roughness, wettability, and surface free energy. Microbiological analysis included CFU (colony-forming units per mL) counts, microbial adhesion at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h, biofilm biovolume, and qualitative biofilm assessment via scanning electron microscopy (sEm). Results: The glazing group showed significantly greater roughness than the polishing (p = 0.006) and control (p = 0.016) groups, along with a lower contact angle (polishing-p = 0.002; control-p < 0.001) and higher surface energy (polishing-p = 0.005; control-p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in CFU counts for the tested microorganisms (C. albicans, p = 0.158; L. casei, p = 0.610; S. mutans, p = 0.904). Regarding microbial adhesion, the polishing group showed a smaller biofilm-covered area compared to the control group for both total biofilm (p = 0.008) and viable biofilm (p = 0.005). no statistically significant difference was observed in biofilm biovolume (p = 0.082). Conclusions: These findings suggest that, despite the surface differences among the groups, biofilm formation was not significantly affected.

