Health Technology Assessment of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems for Paediatric Patients

Type1 diabetes (T1D) is one of the most common chronic diseases in pediatric age. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to improve glycaemic control in adults compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG); however, evidence about its use in the pediatric field is limited and fragmented and needs to be improved. This paper aims to address all the critical aspects linked to the use of CGM in a pediatric population while also describing a methodology for conducting health technology assessment (HTA) to support the decision-making process.

The use of CGM and SMBG in a pediatric population was compared by using a decision-making support tool (DoHTA method). Twenty-seven Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were identified, defining safety, clinical effectiveness, organizational, patient perspective, and economic aspects. Performance scores for both monitoring systems were assessed based on these KPIs, leading to a final comparative ranking.

CGM demonstrated a 29.3% performance advantage over SMBG, highlighting its benefits in terms of clinical effectiveness, patient perspectives, safety, and economic evaluation. No substantial differences were identified in terms of organizational aspects.

This study critically evaluates the benefits and drawbacks of the use of CGM in a pediatric population. It integrates the assessment of the clinical effectiveness with the organizational aspects, the cost, the patient perspective, and the safety, providing a valuable proof of evidence as well as a reliable and transferable method for conducting decision-making processes in a hospital setting.