Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Complete Revascularization in NSTE-ACS and Multivessel Disease: Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Implications
Silviu Raul Muste1, Cristiana Bustea1,2, Elena Emilia Babes1,3
1Doctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Insights
Complete revascularization significantly reduces mortality and ischemic events in non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This strategy is superior to incomplete revascularization for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) frequently co-occurs with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD).
- Treatment decisions are complex, with current guidelines recommending complete revascularization (CR), but lacking robust evidence in hemodynamically stable patients.
- The comparative benefit of CR versus incomplete revascularization (IR) for reducing ischemic events and improving cardiac function in NSTE-ACS with MVD is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of CR versus IR on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in hemodynamically stable NSTE-ACS patients with MVD.
- To assess the effect of CR on all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and ischemic readmissions at 6 and 12 months.
- To determine the influence of CR on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement and hospital length of stay.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study included 282 hemodynamically stable NSTE-ACS patients with MVD.
- Patients were divided into two groups: complete revascularization (CR, n=218) and incomplete revascularization (IR, n=64).
- Outcomes assessed included a composite of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and ischemic readmissions at 6 and 12 months, LVEF, and hospital stay.
Main Results:
- The 6-month composite outcome occurred in 11.0% of CR patients versus 40.6% of IR patients (p < 0.001).
- The 12-month composite outcome occurred in 22.0% of CR patients versus 68.8% of IR patients (p < 0.001).
- CR was associated with significantly lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina; stroke incidence was similar. CR and baseline LVEF were independent predictors of 12-month outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization is a preferred therapeutic strategy for hemodynamically stable NSTE-ACS patients with MVD.
- CR significantly improves event-free survival and reduces mortality and ischemic events compared to IR.
- Prospective randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Abstract:
Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) often coexists with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD), complicating treatment decisions. Current guidelines suggest complete revascularization (CR), yet robust evidence in hemodynamically stable patients remains insufficient. However, the comparative benefit of CR over incomplete revascularization (IR) in reducing ischemic events and improving cardiac function in this population is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CR on all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and ischemic readmissions at 6 and 12 months, as the composite primary outcome, and to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement at discharge and hospital length of stay, as secondary outcomes. A total of 282 hemodynamically stable NSTE-ACS patients with MVD were included, of whom 218 (77.3%) underwent CR and 64 (22.7%) IR. The primary composite outcome occurred in 40.6% of IR patients versus 11.0% in the CR group at 6 months (p < 0.001), and 68.8% vs. 22.0% at 12 months (p < 0.001). CR was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause and cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina. Stroke incidence was similar. Event-free survival favored CR. Multivariable analysis identified CR and baseline LVEF as independent predictors of 12-month outcomes (HR for CR: 7.797; 95% CI: 3.961-15.348; p < 0.001; HR for LVEF: 0.959; CI: 0.926-0.994; p = 0.021). These findings strongly support CR as the preferred therapeutic strategy. Future prospective randomized studies are warranted to confirm the results.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
09:21Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis III: Management