Which Patients in the FLS Should Be Prioritised for a DXA Scan Within 12 Weeks?

At Stavanger University Hospital (SUH), patients aged 50 years and above with a fracture after a fall are included in our Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) at the orthopaedic department, due to their high imminent fracture risk. The FLS at SUH keeps a quality registry, including index fractures, fall from standing/walking, preventive factors, Dual Absorptiometry X-ray (DXA) results and treatment status, in addition to risk factors such as chronic diseases. As in many other hospitals and countries, the capacity of the DXA scanner at SUH does not meet the needs of the ageing population. As such, FLS patients should be prioritised for DXA scanning according to their need for anti-osteoporotic treatment. The aims of this study were (1) to identify whether any risk factors are more strongly associated with osteoporosis than others, and (2) to use this information as a tool to prioritise patients for which the decision to initiate anti-osteoporotic treatment should be assessed by a DXA scan. Method: We used software from CheckWare to keep a structured health record, submitting journal text to the health record and data to our fracture quality registry from 1 June 2022 to 31 December 2024. The fracture coverage of the registry, as part of the medical record, was 100%. Both men and women aged over 50 years with fragility-related fractures were included in the analysis, with index fracture having been reported within 24 months prior to FLS assessment. Exclusion criteria: short life expectancy (<3 years), already started on anti-osteoporotic treatment, living in nursing home, age >97 years, or multi-trauma patients. Statistics were calculated using SPSS and logistic regression. The results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Significant differences were considered at a p-value of <0.05. Results: A total of 6974 patients were included, 81% of which were female. After the DXA scan, 5307 of the patients were started on anti-osteoporotic treatment (76%). Patients aged 50-70 years were the largest group. Female patients or those aged 80 years or older had an increased odds ratio (OR) of starting treatment after a fracture. The index fractures included in the logistic regression analysis and were most likely to initiate anti-osteoporotic treatment in the FLS, were vertebral fracture (p < 0.000, OR 3.1, 95% CI: 2.4-4.0), hip fracture (p < 0.000, OR 2.60, 95% CI: 1.9-3.5), costa fracture (p-value = 0.028, OR:1.3, 95% CI:1.0-1.5), pelvic fracture (p-value < 0.000, OR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.8-5.1). Patients with lack of sufficient vitamin D had increased odds with OR of 1.7 (p-value < 0.00, 95% CI: 1.3-2.2) for having osteoporosis compared to the other FLS patients. Fall from standing, walking or sitting increased the odds for osteoporosis treatment (p-value < 0.000, OR 2.8, 95% CI: 2.3-3.3). Conclusions: The listed risk factors for needing treatment were high for most fractures, especially vertebral, hip, and pelvic fractures. Patients aged 80+ years and with a fracture from standing/walking could also start treatment directly, without waiting for a DXA scan. Thus, these patients should be shifted rapidly to FLS and started on treatment without delay. In this way, DXA scanning can be prioritised for patients for whom supporting information is needed regarding the decision to initiate anti-osteoporotic treatment, such as those with proximal humerus, wrist, or ankle fractures. Time to DXA scan could be shortened for these patients and 12 weeks may be achievable.