Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
'Consider a Less Risky Alternative': Navigating Ethics Approval in Suicide Research
Joanna Brooke1, Caroline Lenette1, Jack Shipway2
1School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Navigating ethics approval for suicide research is complex. This review identifies common issues like risk aversion and lack of standardization in Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and suggests strategies like dialogue and evidence-based processes for smoother approvals.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Psychiatry Research
- Qualitative Research Methods
Background:
- Suicide research faces unique ethical challenges in obtaining institutional approval.
- Existing processes within Research Ethics Committees (RECs) may not adequately support sensitive research areas.
- A gap exists in understanding the specific hurdles and effective navigation strategies for suicide research ethics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify recurring concerns raised by Research Ethics Committees (RECs) regarding suicide research.
- To explore effective strategies for researchers to navigate institutional ethics approval processes.
- To propose improvements for institutional ethics review specifically tailored for suicide research.
Main Methods:
- A narrative review approach was employed to synthesize existing literature.
- Key themes and recurring issues from the literature on REC concerns were identified.
- Effective strategies for managing institutional ethics approval were systematically extracted.
Main Results:
- Six dominant themes emerged: risk aversion, participant agency, lack of support for reflexive practice, quantitative research dominance, REC decision-making variability, and insufficient risk evidence.
- Four key strategies for navigating ethics approval include: building researcher-REC relationships, implementing researcher safeguarding, supporting ethically reflexive practice, and ensuring evidence-based REC processes.
- Significant challenges exist in balancing research benefits with perceived risks and ensuring standardized ethical review.
Conclusions:
- Improving ethics approval for suicide research requires enhanced dialogue between researchers and RECs.
- Processes should be more evidence-based, support researcher reflexivity, and acknowledge the unique ethical considerations of suicide studies.
- Further research into REC members' perspectives is crucial for optimizing ethical review frameworks.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Ethics in Research
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Ethics and Bioethics

