Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
Outcome of colonoscopic decompression in acute colonic pseudo-obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Suprabhat Giri1, Veeraraghavan Krishnamurthy2, Devank Shah3
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar 751024, Odisha, India.
Background:
Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is defined as colonic obstruction without a mechanical or extrinsic inflammatory factor. Colonic decompression is advised for patients with ACPO after the failure of conservative and medical management.
Aim:
To systematically review and analyze the efficacy and safety of colonoscopic decompression in ACPO.
Methods:
A search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to August 2024. Studies reporting the clinical success, perforation, recurrence, and need for surgery after colonoscopic decompression in ACPO were included. A random-effects inverse-variance model was used to calculate the pooled proportion.
Results:
Sixteen studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled rates of success after the first session of colonoscopic decompression and overall success were 78.8% (95%CI: 72.0-85.6) and 91.5% (95%CI: 87.0-96.0), respectively. The first session of colonoscopic decompression had a significantly higher success than the first dose of neostigmine with OR 3.85 (95%CI: 2.00-7.42). The pooled incidence of perforation was 0.9% (95%CI: 0.0-2.0), while recurrence was observed in 17.1% (95%CI: 12.9-21.3) of the patients after clinical success. The pooled rates of surgery in all cases undergoing colonoscopic decompression and those who had a successful procedure were 10.5% (95%CI: 5.0-15.9) and 3.7% (95%CI: 0.3-7.1), respectively. Subgroup analysis, excluding the low-quality studies, did not significantly change the event rates.
Conclusion:
Colonoscopic decompression for ACPO is associated with a clinical success rate of > 90% with a perforation rate of < 1%, demonstrating high efficacy and safety.
More Related Videos
03:50Acupoint Application Combined with Acupoint Massage for Treating Constipation in a Patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: August 18, 2023
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...